I don’t mind that people disagree, but I feel like his Life Sentence Without Parole was, indeed, justified. I get that he was young at the time of the crime and he was begging for help he wasn’t getting. That does not excuse the crime, nor does it make the crime any less of a crime.
I also feel that, maybe in 20 or 25 years, he should have a shot at appealing the “Without Parole” part of his sentence. I do think he has a genuine shot at getting that part of his sentence reconsidered if his time in prison reformed him. But he did kill four people…and probably tried to kill more. So I think he should serve at least 20 years if not more, before he even gets allowed to be considered for Parole.
I don’t mind that people disagree, but I feel like his Life Sentence Without Parole was, indeed, justified. I get that he was young at the time of the crime and he was begging for help he wasn’t getting. That does not excuse the crime, nor does it make the crime any less of a crime.
I also feel that, maybe in 20 or 25 years, he should have a shot at appealing the “Without Parole” part of his sentence. I do think he has a genuine shot at getting that part of his sentence reconsidered if his time in prison reformed him. But he did kill four people…and probably tried to kill more. So I think he should serve at least 20 years if not more, before he even gets allowed to be considered for Parole.