• cygnus@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Great post. I would add that it’s also a debate on the nature of what it means to be a parent, of the relationship of a child to their parent, and minors’ status as a legal person. The conservative view sees children as the property of their parents whose will overrides any preferences of the child, whereas the left is increasingly moving towards the idea that children are an autonomous person with agency and rights that supersede the wishes of the parent. It seems that a lot of parents take issue with that fact, as I’m sure many do with the fact that they are no longer “allowed” to beat their children.

    • Troy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yes, there’s definitely a core of this element here. At one point in time, women were legally the chattel property of their husbands. Do you own a child like you own a pet? Is sending your kid to school like sending your dog to doggie daycare?

      Quoting one of my favourite sci fi writers, Becky Chambers (in: A Closed and Common Orbit) – an alien reflecting on humanity:

      “At the core, you’ve got to get university certification for parenting, just as you do for, say, being a doctor or an engineer. No offence to you or your species, but going into the business of creating life without any sort of formal prep is . . .’ He laughed. ‘It’s baffling. But then, I’m biased.”

      • cygnus@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        1 year ago

        Becky Chambers! Now that’s a crossover I didn’t expect here. Love her work.

        To push the analogy to its breaking point, it was also used to justify slavery and is still used to justify mistreatment of animals.

        I think this ultimately all stems from a lack of empathy, which I consider a foundation of conservatism – the indifference to the fact that one’s desires may not align with the preferences of the person to whom they are directed.

        • Troy@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          1 year ago

          Now that’s a crossover I didn’t expect here.

          Sample bias, probably. We nerds are the early adopters. ;)

          A couple of communities on server that might be interesting to you, one of them of my own creation: Futurism@lemmy.ca, PrintSF

          a lack of empathy, which I consider a foundation of conservatism

          It’s probably at least one vector. Religion is another one. The ironic thing, of course, is “Do unto others as you would have them do unto you”. But it’s hard to teach empathy through rote memorization of a text that hasn’t been updated in nearly 2000 years. Knowing the words, and living the words, are two different things. And even then, many of the words are out of date (pork is delicious!).

          • cygnus@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            1 year ago

            The ironic thing, of course, is “Do unto others as you would have them do unto you”

            Not that ironic if the parents’ views genuinely differ from their child’s. The parent can be homophobic and genuinely see it as an abhorrent thing that should be remedied.

            • Yardy Sardley@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              12
              ·
              1 year ago

              This is the scary thing about conservatism/religion. It gives people the tools, through an absolutist and precsriptivist system of beliefs, to otherize people, and rationalize away the empathy that they do feel. Or perhaps use their empathy to justify doing horrible things to someone “for their own good”, like the parent trying to remedy their child’s “abhorrent behaviour” for example.

      • HelixDab@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        TBH, I try to give my pets as much autonomy as is safe for them. E.g., they’re going to the vet whether they want to or not if they’re sick. But I try to let them decide when they want attention, and what kind of attention and interaction they want, rather than forcing them. They seem to be happier that way.

        I also don’t worry about training them, because they’re all cats.