A fake emergency call to police resulted in officers responding Friday night to the home of Maine Secretary of State Shenna Bellows just a day after she removed former President Donald Trump from the state’s presidential primary ballot under the Constitution’s insurrection clause.

She becomes the latest elected politician to become a target of swatting, which involves making a prank phone call to emergency services with the intent that a large first responder presence, including SWAT teams, will show up at a residence.

Bellows was not home when the swatting call was made, and responding officers found nothing suspicious.

      • LazaroFilm@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        63
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        10 months ago

        Then so for an identification or lower the response force. It feels like they just get a random phone call, no proof of anything and they just barge in within 10min. But when my neighbor plays loud music all night no one cares.

    • BlanketsWithSmallpox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      All you need is a VPN and a VOIP number. It’s not hard to do and you can order them easily online. Let alone text to voice readers.

      There’s a reason why swatting and bomb threats have been popular for a decade now.

      Privacy is a two way street. When it comes to serious threats, the same things that protect you, protect people who would abuse those tools.

        • BlanketsWithSmallpox@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          18
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          Well unless you want FBI back doors built into every VPN in every sovereign nation, then it’s unfortunately a byproduct of our need for privacy due to corporate and governmental overreach.

          The FBI and other three letter agencies already pay huge bucks for hats when they can. Common encryption aren’t going to be broken for at least a couple decades. We almost always encrypt better than decrypt though by the very nature of the process though.

          Quantum computing is moving faster than most people realize but it will never beat out better encryption.

            • MeatsOfRage@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              8
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              10 months ago

              Problem is there’s a ton of legitimate VoIP. My brother had a VoIP home phone for years because it costs next to nothing. Police can’t just not go to a call because it’s a VoIP call.

            • jimbolauski@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              10 months ago

              They can spoof the phone number so it’s a phone number associated the address.

    • Pratai@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      10 months ago

      Well, since conservatives are cowards- it’s virtually impossible to catch them because they’ve perfected hiding and/or blaming others for their crimes.

    • FireTower@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      10 months ago

      It is. The problems arise when it’s an anonymous phone call. The police are still going to show up to a potential hostage situation if the caller spoofs a number.

    • gregorum@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      Arguably, the cops knew the address they were going to was a Secretary of State, but they went there anyway.

    • shalafi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      Didn’t read the article, huh? FAFO with 911, you’ll see if it’s punishable or not.

  • shalafi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    71
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    10 months ago

    More stochastic terrorism. Used to be the political party involved would be tripping over themselves to disavow such actions. Now? 🦗🦗🦗…

  • Fisk400@feddit.nu
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    I believe they meant to say fraudulent phone call and not prank phone call.

  • pl_woah@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    10 months ago

    I’m inclined to believe the local PD knows the addresses of officials… So they let this happen on purpose.

    • Wolf_359@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      I doubt it. Not a good look for them.

      My guess would be that they took it more seriously since letting something happen to an elected official would be a PR nightmare for them. That, or they knew it could be a hoax but proceeded out of an abundance of caution.

    • WoahWoah@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      Yes, they probably do have those addresses. Given this woman has received innumerable threats against her life, and the police called her since she was not at home, and she is the one that asked the police to check inside the home, which they then did, what exactly would you suggest happen? That the police ignore a call that indicated violence occurring at the home of a public official that has credible violent threats leveled against her?

  • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    Five bucks says it is someone who has already gotten some infamy for doing things like this in the past like Jacob Wohl.

    • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      You’re on. I say it’s Trump. Or possibly Byron Barron. (edit…lol. we should all just start “who are you again? Duncan?” to trump. probably set his ego off even more than tiny-hands jokes)

      • spamfajitas@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        10 months ago

        Probably some punk named John Barron who I hear many people say has the yugest hands and smells amazing.