• crackajack@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    9 months ago

    It did happen to New Jersey, Norway and France. Rich people leave when you tax them. I’m not arguing against the law, but to prevent “flight of the rich”, the law has to be applied universally. Or if that can’t happen, do what Norway did, tax wealth flight.

    • NOT_RICK@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      9 months ago

      I’ve read studies that indicate the tax flight from NJ wasn’t as bad as people made it out to be as net tax revenue still increased and that some of the migration can be attributed to factors other than the tax increase. Still, I agree a blanket tax on the rich is ideal.

    • Frostbeard@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      It’s how you tax. Some Norwegians left because not the income but the fortune was taxed. And by fortune also the value of stocks and such. The issue for some was they needed to sell off stocks to pay the tax. Also Norway established a new tax that tax the fortune if you leave. I am ALL for taxing the wealthy, but if the money has already been taxed…

      • IamSparticles@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        I mean, if the point is to stop people from stockpiling wealth and increasing wealth disparity, then it sounds pretty effective.