• Lvxferre@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Better than disabling it:

    • Understand it - low score boils down to “people don’t want to see it”. Everything else is assumption, and should be taken with a grain of salt.
    • Deal with it - you won’t be able to please everyone all the time.
    • Vote - if you see some post/comment that you feel like undeservedly downvoted, by all means, upvote it.

    I still wish that downvoting was multidimensional though. Negative feedback is important.

    • TwinTurbo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Negative feedback is important.

      Exactly. Without it, we’ll have the same problem that YouTube has without dislikes, where a video with a hundred likes and a thousand dislikes appears as a generally liked video…

      • Lvxferre@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Imagine a system that works like this:

        • upvotes - a simple click, as it is now
        • downvotes - you click the downvote button, and then specify a reason from a list (disagreeable, unfunny, inaccurate, off-topic, rude, disingenuous, etc.)

        So it’s a bit like Slashdot, but only for negative reactions.

        Each “reason” would be a dimension, as now you can measure content by funniness, accuracy, etc. And one of the effects of this system is that, if you are being downvoted, you’ll have a better grasp on why. It’s considerably more useful as feedback, for users in good faith.

        (It has a few additional advantages too; for example custom sorting filters, and the very fact that a downvote takes a tiiiny bit more effort than an upvote should encourage positive feedback over negative one.)

  • fubo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    Don’t worry about it. Many heavily downvoted posts are also clearly in violation of either the community or instance rules; e.g. non-news posts in a news forum, or bigoted posts on instances that don’t permit that.

    • Engywuck@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      1 year ago

      Well, in my personal experience people become emotional and downvote you about trivial comment that don’t break any rule. For instance, I was recently donwoted to hell for saying that I despise Mozilla and prefer to use Brave instead of Firefox. 🤷‍♂️

        • Engywuck@lemmy.mlOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          9
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          But why? Why can’t I use a browser that work better for me and that I find more visually pleasant? It is this sort of hivemind thatg ruins communities. Also, for me heresy is not a negative word.

      • BrikoX@vlemmy.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Mozilla followers are like a cult members. Mozilla has done a lot of good, but it’s far from perfect, but some people just refuse to accept any negative comments about it.

  • NoTime@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s partly why I joined lemmy.one as they disable downvotes.

  • Engywuck@lemmy.mlOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Just engage, if you disagree with people. Engagement is much more useful than just donwoting and exposes different point of views.