The US transportation secretary announced on Wednesday afternoon that no grounded Boeing 737 Max 9 would return to service “until it is safe”, after Alaska Airlines announced the cancellation of all flights on its 737 Max 9 planes at the direction of the Federal Aviation Administration.

Pete Buttigieg said he was “not putting a timeline” on when the FAA will allow the planes to resume flights.

Every plane that the US aircraft manufacturer delivers “needs to be 100% safe”, Buttigieg added.

He said he has spoken to the head of Boeing and told him the company needs to do everything it can to establish 100% confidence in its planes.

  • Szymon@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    77
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Two groundings in less than 5 years? Boeing is trading lives for share price. Hopefully the company dies as an example of corporate greed.

    • Raiderkev@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      43
      ·
      1 year ago

      Every insider said this the last time they had issues with the Max 8. Now here we are again. It absolutely infuriates me. I work for a medical device company in procurement. I’ve had to deal with these asshats coming in and recommending outsourcing and screwing our local vendors to save a few bucks… Then, surprise! We get shit parts, and it costs us a ton of resources to fix the issue, but hey we’re"saving money" right? Some companies shouldn’t be publicly traded.

    • blazeknave@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s like the first scene in fight club, where he’s talking about the insurance equation. That shaped my world view then. It’s accurate.

    • Copernican@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      18
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I don’t understand the ultra anti business vibe these days. If a company has to do lay offs (like Spotify) because they over predicted growth, it’s up in arms for the worker getting screwed due corporate greed. Then we have this angle where everyone wants Boeing to die, which will result in a ton of workers losing their jobs. Why isn’t the hope just the board doing their jobs, changing leadership to align with the old boeing, let workers keep their jobs, and let their stock benefits increase in value for contributing to a good company?

      • Starkstruck@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        1 year ago

        Because that’ll never happen. Boeing’s board is never going to have a “change of heart”. They’ll keep playing with people’s lives to make a quick buck until they’re stopped.

        • Eatspancakes84@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          But the record of Boeing before the MAX has not been so bad right? Probably related, they used to be a great workplace for blue-collar workers. The excesses of greed seem to have gotten way worse recently.

          • wahming@monyet.cc
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            Boeing changed management when they merged with McDonnell Douglas. Their new management is worthless

            • Copernican@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              Exactly. So it’s weird to see a popular sentiment be Spotify laying off 1500 is bad corporate greed. But then celebrated wishful thinking that Boeing should die due to corporate greed and put 150,000 employees out of work which is somehow good.

              • wahming@monyet.cc
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                6
                ·
                1 year ago

                It’s not weird. A company laying off employees when they don’t have to just to increase profits IS corporate greed.

                A company dieing so that other companies that have (hopefully) not yet enshittified is not mutually exclusive with the above sentiment. Also, due to the relatively inflexible market demand, any other company taking over Boeing’s market share would need to absorb most of their skilled labour.

                • Copernican@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  So why don’t you think the laid off Spotify employees will have an equally soft landing of just being absorbed into other companies?

                  • wahming@monyet.cc
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    Well it’s not like any other company is getting Spotify’s market share and needs to scale up their infrastructure

      • Potatos_are_not_friends@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I don’t understand the ultra anti business vibe these days. If a company has to do lay offs (like Spotify) because they over predicted growth, it’s up in arms for the worker getting screwed due corporate greed

        1. Boeing gets bailed out with gov money because it’s “too big to fail”
        2. Boeing used that money for stock buybacks
        3. Boeing’s quality went down. This ain’t the “that’s weird”, this is people’s LIVES. People die if there’s quality errors.
        4. Boeing lied about MCAS and 300 people paid the price.
        5. This is ANOTHER incident of shotty work

        This isn’t anti business. Their management is fucking corrupt

      • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Because that isn’t going to happen so the only remaining hope is that when they die us taxpayers don’t have to bail them out too much.