• dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    11 months ago

    I agree.

    The problem comes from wanting something “simple” like “tell my phone when the dryer is done.” Because we lack anything resembling a “home wireless notification protocol”, the alternatives are practically non-starters for a range of reasons. Assuming that we need a wireless leg to the user’s device, here’s the state of the art:

    • SMS requires the dryer to also be a cellphone
    • Bluetooth range is too short to be useful for everyone
    • A private dryer network would require your phone/device on multiple WiFi networks at once
    • Email or any other online chat protocol requires the dryer be online too
    • Phone app that only talks across the home LAN WiFi (e.g. 192.168.x.x) requires user to understand IP networking*
    • Packet radio would work, but is non-private, would be a disaster in apartment buildings, and nobody has a receiver

    A solution that uses a phone app that talks to an online service, and a WiFi connected device that does the same is the path of least resistance. And I say this as someone who really doesn’t like this fact.

    (*A device that can display a QR code to auto-configure a phone app would work a treat, but dot-matrix displays cost)

    • saigot@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      There’s zwave and zigbee. Downside is that you need a central hub, alot of hubs I’ve seen (cough hue cough) only really work with their products. It’s a cool technology that has been ruined by corps refusing to play ball with each other, even when in different market segments.