Major Y [an American who went to Israel to fight] and other people on the ground I have spoken with say that they estimate about one in every two or three [civilian] homes in Gaza they go into has military weaponry, including AK47s, grenades and rocket launchers. And they routinely find entrances to Hamas’s terror tunnels inside civilian houses. And not just anywhere, but most often in the children’s bedrooms and even under cots.

Archive: https://web.archive.org/web/20240118082318/https://nypost.com/2023/12/28/opinion/hamas-philosophy-all-civilians-all-children-are-tools-of-war/

    • fubo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      Well no, the Netanyahu administration has been propping up Hamas to keep the Palestinian Authority weak and incapable of resisting illegal settlements. Illegal settlers are a big part of Netanyahu’s base.

      There is no Palestinian genocide. If the Israeli government wanted to commit a genocide, they would be doing it a lot more effectively. After all, there are many ethnic Palestinians who are Israeli citizens; if there was a Palestinian genocide, those people would be getting killed, efficiently and systematically. They’re not.

      Netanyahu is a traitor to the state of Israel for funding an antisemitic terrorist organization, Hamas.

      It is unfortunate that Hamas likes to hide military operations in hospitals, schools, and apartment buildings. There’s a really good reason that international law forbids that sort of thing — because doing that makes hospitals, schools, and apartment buildings legitimate military targets.

      • enkers@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        Maybe you need a refresher on what genocide is. Here’s an excerpt from the UN definition:

        Article II of the Genocide Convention contains a narrow definition of the crime of genocide, which includes two main elements:

        1. A mental element: the “intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such”; and
        2. A physical element, which includes the following five acts, enumerated exhaustively:
        • Killing members of the group
        • Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group
        • Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part
        • Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group
        • Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group

        Israel simply intends to kill enough Palestinians to guarantee an ethnic majority in the region. Even if they don’t intended to eliminate every Palestinian, that still constitutes a genocide.

        • speaker_hat@lemmy.oneOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          8 months ago

          A mental element: the “intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such”;

          Israel never showed intention to do so. So this is off.

          Killing members of the group

          Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group

          Hamas members are necessarily Palestinians, so these are off.

          Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part

          Israel never showed intention to do so. So this is also off.

          Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group

          Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group

          Israel never showed intention to do so. And never forcibly transfered children. So this is also off.

          Hence, your argument of genocide is false.

          • alcyoneous@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            Intent doesn’t need to be explicit, but in this case it is.

            https://abcnews.go.com/International/wireStory/harsh-israeli-rhetoric-palestinians-central-south-africas-genocide-106471144

            In particular:

            “Deputy Knesset speaker Nissim Vaturi from the ruling Likud party wrote on X, formerly known as Twitter, that Israelis had one common goal, “erasing the Gaza Strip from the face of the earth.” Israeli Heritage Minister Amichay Eliyahu, from the far-right Jewish Power party, suggested that Israel drop a nuclear bomb on Gaza and said there were “no uninvolved civilians” in the territory.”

            Also the list of genocidal acts, as per the UN Genocide Convention, stipulates that any one of those acts is genocide, not that all 5 must be done. Acts 1 to 3 are very clearly being used in Gaza, and with Knesset members establishing intent it’s clearly a genocide, but arguably even without those statements the actions Israel has undertaken still fit the definition.

            • speaker_hat@lemmy.oneOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              8 months ago

              Thanks for the detailed reply. I agree that the fact that the Israeli government is currently far-right is a problem, and it’s no making the war situation easier.

              Both politicians you quoted, Nissim Vaturi and Eliyahu, are far-right in their vision and views, as a result they say such an extreme sayings.

              However, they don’t have any military influence and cannot have because of their position.

              The ones who do have military power, didn’t show intentions to do so.

      • speaker_hat@lemmy.oneOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        Per Hamas 2017 charter, there is no indication about “civil rights” or “civil safety”, so they actually (unfortunately) don’t care.