Keep in mind they’re sophists so it has to be a well-structured logical argument. I don’t know why I keep arguing with these kinds of people. Disclaimer: I’m pro-LGBT.

  • otp@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    10 months ago

    Spreading disease can be immoral, but when it comes to sex, that should be two properly-educated and consenting adults doing something that won’t affect anyone beyond the two of them.

    We can reassess the situation when diseases transmitted by gay sex are overwhelming hospitals.

    • tygerprints@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      Homosexuality IS NOT IMMORAL and never could be. Only if all human sexuality is immoral, and it isn’t. Only a total uneducated idiotic piece of filth would ever say that homosexuality is immoral. It is not immoral. It never could be immoral.

      • otp@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Yes, did you reply to the wrong comment? Lol

        I said “Spreading disease can be immoral”. Not that homosexuality can be immoral.

        • tygerprints@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          I probably did respond to the wrong comment then - wouldnt be the first time. : / I was responding to the idea of sexuality of any kind being immoral - which is ridiculous. Willfully spreading disease WOULD be immoral in my opinion, including refusing to get COVID vaccinations every year.