• AllonzeeLV@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    It’s more than that, because Republican governors have been actively trying and succeeding in rolling back hard won child labor protection laws.

    It’s not just about not having the foreigns telling them what to do, it’s because Republicans want children providing cheap labor to boost their stock portfolio. Here. Now.

    • Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      10 months ago

      Labor is only one of a multitude of things that this treaty addresses. Conservatives have been objecting to issues of sovereignty around its language on education, corporal punishment, criminal punishment, healthcare, sex and gender discrimination, etc.

      It’s also worth noting that this treaty has carveouts to allow certain forms of child labor. Moreover, the US was able to ratify ILO 182 to agree to ban the worst forms of child labor.

      I’m not saying child labor might not be a motivator for some of then conservatives opposed to ratifying this treaty, but there is a LOT more in there that US conservatives hate to relinquish control over, and when treaties are just focused on labor law, they have been easier to ratify.

      This is more complex than just labor. The labor argument a fraction of the full story.