After 33 years and four children, Baby Boomers Marta and Octavian Dragos say they feel trapped in what was once their dream home in El Cerrito, California.

Both over 70, the Dragos are empty nesters, and like many of their generation, they’re trying to figure out how to downsize from their 3,000-square-foot, five-bedroom home.

“We are here in a huge house with no family nearby, trying to make a wise decision, both financially and for our well-being,” said Dragos, a retired teacher.

But selling and downsizing isn’t easy, appealing or even financially advantageous for many homeowners like the Dragos family.

Many Boomers whose homes have surged in value now face massive capital gains tax bills when they sell. This is a kind of tax on the profit you make when selling an investment or an asset, like a home, that has increased in value.

Plus, smaller homes or apartments in the neighborhoods they’ve come to love are rare. And with current prices and mortgage rates so high, there is often a negligible cost difference between their current home and a smaller one.

  • stoly@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    44
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    The entire argument comes down to “oh, those poor people, they have to pay their fair share of taxes on the huge amount of equity they’ve just earned”. Seriously, the bias is disgusting.

    • johannesvanderwhales@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      24
      ·
      11 months ago

      Equity isn’t money in your pocket, though, and just because the house is suddenly worth $1.5 million on paper doesn’t mean they have extra money to pay their tax bill.

      I know lots of people are bitter about the housing market but I don’t think it’s the fault of people who bought a home and just want to live in it. The people (or corporations) who buy homes as investment properties or to flip them are probably more worthy of anger.

      • stoly@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        I think you just argued against home ownership. The point in the equity is that it has a sustained value but is also non-fungible. The moment they sell the house, they will have all that cash to pay that tax bill. If they turn that equity into new equity (i.e sell one house and buy another) then they won’t pay a single cent unless their earnings are greater than $500,000.

      • Croquette@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        They took the worse couple in the article. They have the house since the 90s. They will pocket a big fat check, and they are angry that they have to pay taxes on that.

        Cry me a river.

      • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        Don’t have the money to pay the tax bill? Show me that math.

        You buy a house for 300k, sell for 700k, you made 500k, that’s 15% tax filed jointly on long-term property. But wait! There’s more! You get to exclude the first 250k if it’s your primary residence! So you’re paying 15% on 250k. $37,500. Which is substantially less than income taxes.

        They just sold the house and (assuming it was paid off) have 700k (less realtors fees, etc.) and absolutely could pay the tax. Even if it wasn’t paid off, the capital gains would be reduced and they would owe less money. We’ve moved and sold 2 homes in the last 20 years, made capital gains on each sale, and paid the appropriate taxes because we aren’t idiots and didn’t piss the money away.

        So tell me again how they don’t have the “extra money to pay their tax bill”?

      • doggle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        11 months ago

        The article is explicitly about capital gains. It’s not like they have to pay the tax before they sell it. Use the proceeds from selling to pay the tax. That’s the whole point.

      • Solemn@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        When they sell the asset, they need to pay the tax. Conveniently, at that point the sale provides the money from such the taxes should be paid.