• atx_aquarian@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    Every time a missile test fails anywhere, I wonder if another power’s hackers were involved, like how stuxnet was this perfectly targeted worm that sabotaged a bunch of uranium centrifuges in Iran. I’d like to think either that hackers are keeping us a little safer from physical weapons or that governments are deliberately flopping tests to avoid escalation.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      7 months ago

      More likely, rocketry is not easy or safe, which is why multiple SpaceX rockets have also failed. Not to mention all the other launch companies.

        • perviouslyiner@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          Solid rocket motors ought to be a whole lot more reliable than those newly-developed or experimental liquid fuel engines

          From Wikipedia: “Should the missile fail to breach the surface of the water, there are several safety mechanisms that can … deactivate the missile before launch

  • magnetosphere@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    7 months ago

    Each missile is worth around £17m and the last test in 2016 also ended in failure when the missile veered off course.

    Maybe they should perform these tests a bit more often.