• FlihpFlorp@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    9 months ago

    I feel like that’s one of those things where the conversational use of chemicals and scientific use has drifted apart

    There’s plenty of examples but the only one I can think of is evolution, like In every terrible sci-fi movie ever using evolution to describe the individual evil monster gaining some change

    Anyways 100% agree with you tho

      • ArcaneGadget@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        9 months ago

        I find myself thinking this a lot. Someone goes; “and that’s my theory about…” And I’m like; that’s not a theory, that’s a hypothesis…

          • eggmasterflex@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            Idk if that helps your point as it’s simultaneously one of the most studied and least understood things in physics. Although I doubt a creationist could mount that argument.

            • Lmaydev@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              8 months ago

              The point is it’s not just a guess with no evidence which is what they think a theory is.

              If they came back with that you try and explain that’s why it’s called a theory and not a fact.

    • Exocrinous@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      9 months ago

      AI. In the real world, AI is any computer process that can make decisions as if it were smart. Expert systems, genetic algorithms, hell even fuzzy logic. A smart lightbulb is artificially smart. Artificially intelligent.

      In movies and bad tech blogs, AI means a sapient machine and that’s why LLMs aren’t actually AI.