Wendy’s has spoken to its manager after suggestions that it plans to introduce “surge pricing” to its menu received a decidedly frosty response this week, with the company scrambling to clarify that it has no intention of making itself the Uber of fast-food chains.

  • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    8 months ago

    That would also teach them to not bother backing down if there’s backlash in response to an announcement…

    • michaelmrose@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      8 months ago

      So you have a certain level of annual profit. You suggest something incredibly offensive that you believe will increase profits by say 10% with the idea you can roll it back if its a net negative. The response is so negative that you re-assess and believe you will actually LOSE 10%. You roll it back but people are still pissed so you end up losing 2% to decrease in goodwill.

      Anyone whose take away is that they should just roll on and lose 10% would be a fucking idiot. The proper take away ought to be staff ideas like this with a disinterested third party before announcing to the world so you don’t lose good will in the first place.

      • Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        8 months ago

        It is logical, I know for a fact that’s how a lot of executives think when there’s a backlash, they maybe go back part way or all the way on it (usually the former) people are still (rightly) upset then eventually they get jaded to the point of not giving a fuck about the backlash and making even worse decisions.

        • Cosmicomical@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          8 months ago

          Those executives should be fired. Or at this point they should just set prices regardless of market, even though no one will buy at that price point. Same ridiculous logic.

        • michaelmrose@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          8 months ago

          The logical presumption is that the backslash for proposing it is a fraction of what the backlash is for implementing it.

            • Cosmic Cleric@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              8 months ago

              They will find ways to blame anyone or anything else.

              They can say whatever they want, but everyone knows where the buck stops at, who’s ultimately responsible for the decisions. Especially so the stockholders.

              • Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                8 months ago

                In theory sure, but in the real world it’s much more messy and convoluted.

                Just to state what I thought was obvious, I don’t agree with or think this is how things should be done, but it makes sense if you understand the corporate ghoul mindset.

                • Cosmic Cleric@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  8 months ago

                  Well, I was just discussing the ‘backlash’ portion of your comment, and not your overall belief of the subject.

                  And I promise you, I live in the real world as well.

                  • Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    8 months ago

                    Then you should be well aware that they will find ways to obscure and divert blame wherever and however possible.