• Telodzrum@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    It doesn’t really matter if the science has changed, public health isn’t (correctly) based exclusively on the science. It’s about risk mitigation, following the best advice regarding morbidity from virologists means nothing if the population you’re attempting to protect won’t follow the guidance. Public health policy is about the possible and finding the most effective part of the curve plotted between pure science and social behavior.

    • ReallyActuallyFrankenstein@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      That’s a very reasonable and rational response, thank you. I do wish, however, that for people like me who absolutely do want to take the optimal approach and don’t care very much about getting back to “normal” if it means materially increasing the risk of COVID, that they would tell me what that best path is. Maybe modeling for multiple types of social behavior is too labor-intensive for them, I don’t know.

      • brygphilomena@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        It’s a communicable disease. Like all of them, it’s isolation and rest. You can look at the incubation period of the virus and how long you stay infected and go off those things for the best way of preventing the transmission of the disease.

        As for managing symptoms, there is paxlovid. But again, like a lot of them, it’s just managing it. Rest and medication.