• Max-P@lemmy.max-p.me
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    44
    ·
    8 months ago

    IMO Mint is to Ubuntu what Manjaro is to Arch: a pile of duct tape in the name of user experience ready to blow at the worst time, down to the TLS certificate mishaps.

    People pick really weird distros to worship…

    • themarty27@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      34
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      More like Ubuntu is to Debian what Manjaro is to Arch. And then Linux Mint takes the nice stuff from Ubuntu but does away with the bullshit.

      • UnfortunateShort@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        I think you give Manjaro a little too much credit here. Not that I want to hate on it, but Ubuntu is much less closely related to Debian than Manjaro is to Arch.

        • themarty27@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          Yeah, my point was more that both Manjaro and Ubuntu are systematically mismanaged derivatives of brilliant upstream distros with regular blunders in their development process, but with inexplicably large communities.

    • kusivittula@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      8 months ago

      when i decided to dump windows, i tried lots of distros. most would refuse to install or even boot to live, and the ones that do install successfully have issues with nvidia. like parts of the screen going unresponsive, constantly reverting to 60 hz, and just completely crashing. ubuntu does all three, fedora won’t even install, arch distros can’t find any of my sound devices. but mint works. no nvidia issues, no crashing, all devices work, refresh rate stays at 120. that’s some damn good duct tape.