• 0 Posts
  • 14 Comments
Joined 29 days ago
cake
Cake day: March 10th, 2025

help-circle

  • All of that is irrelevant to an end user. They have the choice between tool A which is free but developing very slowly, or tool B which is paid but has all of the stuff they need.

    99.99% will choose tool B and rightfully so.

    Case in point: Serif isn’t currently rewriting their old stuff, they already did 10 years ago. Affinity photo/designer/etc have been out for a decade.



  • Again with this tired excuse. “It’s free therefore everybody should just accept subpar software”.

    You know what else is free? Gonorrhea. Doesn’t mean it’s something I should want, nor is anyone who isn’t an STI researcher barred from saying it blows.

    Just to be clear, I don’t give a rat’s ass what anyone uses to do their editing. Suit yourself. Just don’t expect others to follow suit and sing the praises of a thing just because it’s FOSS.


  • Your boss is also paying for time spent troubleshooting, which is why industry standards are a thing. People can help each other out, common issues only have to be solved once and the general pool of issues is smaller.

    I work with 12 artists who all use maya. There’s enough troubleshooting to do on just that. Having some of them use blender, others modo, etc would be a nightmare.

    I can guarantee you not one person in our company is concerned with Adobe’s stock price, yet everyone is on Creative Cloud. Industry standards are the logical result of groups of people trying to get shit done, not some clandestine conspiracy to increase Adobe’s profits.


  • and GIMP dev actually planning to add shape tool.

    Gimp’s first version released in 1998. Do you find it surprising that people aren’t impressed by plans to add basic tools after nearly 30 years when the competition has stuff like content-aware filling and automatic layer separation?

    There are many valid arguments against using Adobe products, or for using open source editing software. Productivity and ease of use are not one of them.






  • It’s less uneducated thinking and more “here’s a thing I read online that I can parrot to show that I am more rational than others”.

    That statistic could be entirely unfounded and people would still be repeating it because it serves their purposes. Internet nerds love gotchas.

    That aside, fully agreed regarding the level of control. It’s a little like saying “people have - and therefore you have - an x% chance of getting lung cancer” while completing ignoring that a huge portion of that is a direct result of only some people’s behaviour, namely smoking.

    The people driving defensively, sober and attentively are not likely to be the ones folding themselves around a roadside tree.



  • 3xBork@lemmy.worldtoCanada@lemmy.caThis is who Danielle Smith is meeting.
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    12 days ago

    Yeah just like the “bank run” on FTX wasn’t what caused it to go bankrupt, it was actually the owner’s hubris.

    In much the same way that the fire didn’t burn the house down, it was the tenant buying matches four days earlier.

    If you’re willing to go that many levels down to get to the root cause of an event you might as well say the nazis being humans is what caused the collapse.