edit profile
- 0 Posts
- 261 Comments
218·3 months ago2500 people die because of heat… Sure it sucks but that’s like almost nothing
Nice strawman argument, not really what I said haha
It does not matter whether you’re poor or minority or what. In Europe we all have to suffer. And 31°C is also quite common here in summer and barely anyone as AC.
There are some edge cases where it would make sense to have a right to it (medical conditions e.g.) but besides that I think it’s just an american privilege debate.
Most American take ever…
How is a ‘right to AC’ gonna solve climate change lol.
While I understand your frustration, intuitive UI/UX is ‘real’ and not just a marketing gag. But you have to invest the money and the time to do proper user research.
Gimp works fine… but it’s not intuitive and the UI/UX is horrible.
work very intuitively
I only ever used gimp
1·3 months agoWorks for me. Mb try a vpn
52·3 months agoYeah if I’d be her I’d rather cut my finger off than do that tbh 😅
If she uses software from CC and not only stores data there then I don’t think anything will be able to replace it without frustration. You have to get used to a whole different workflow.
The right Deezer Downloaders have Flac tho
Is it dumb because it is not the closes equivalent? Yes.
Is it dumb because this doesn’t get sold frequently? No.
In Nuremberg we have the same thing, but it’s just multiple smaller sausages instead of 1. I’d argue you find the potatoes/kraut salad x sausage combo almost everywhere.
2·4 months agoI mean we’re here in the comments to exchange perspectives primarily. Never saw anyone quoting research papers. There’s no rule about forbidding comments to be biased or opinionated. So I’d say our access to any form of potential objective truth, as fundamental basis for discussion, is fairly limited. World news is not only about scientifically validated facts. It’s rather a fast paced informational feed, where you have to balance speed and factual quality.
And we had context for the anticar lobby comment, so it’s not like the person said: look, here is the irrefutable truth from an independent source. They rather said: Look here are some reasons for why XYZ is bad.
I don’t have a problem with it, besides it being a lazy and hard to read solution.
I’m not sure if you know what objective truth means, but why would you expect it from an anticar lobby sub? Like, it’s a political movement… not a scientific research facility? It’s not their goal to be objective, but to push for change. Not saying the things they stated are wrong, but they are first and foremost moral statements.
Where do they say it represents a form of ‘objective truth’?
But I agree walls of text are not nice, at least try to summarize it a bit to make it readable…
20·4 months agoThe oldest building in/around Vienna is believed to be the Roman stone quarry in Leithaprodersdorf. It dates back to the Roman era, around 43 AD.
The oldest continuously inhabited building in Vienna is generally considered to be the Griechenbeisl, a historic restaurant located in the Innere Stadt district. It has been in operation since the 15th century.
Many Designers are not good at knowing what their users need, because they don’t have the resources, background or education to understand user behaviour.
Not even the AI listens to our gibberish
Context matters and if people just throw praise around without reading the situation it won’t work anyway. Sugarcoating is still valid to make people feel good about themselves, but it should a well timed sidenote, not more