I stand in solidarity with Godot.

Oh ho… No, you’re not the only one I’m afraid. It was fine until a couple hours ago, the newest comments confirm it so. Not sure what’s going on.

Hopefully Ross figures it out and it goes back up soon. Thanks for the interest!

EDIT: It’s back up.

Hey folks, just sharing the message. I believe it’s related to piracy as it frequently comes into contact with the preservation of media. As whatever is DRM Free and capable of working offline, is effectively able to last indefinitely.

If you’re European and eligible, please consider.

Cheers

I know you mean this is as joke, but oddly enough, Pitfall, by Activision is still available!

Not sure, but the blast radius is tremendous, even games from the Atari 2600, a console released nearly fifty fucking years ago have been taken down.

Been using it as well. It requires practice, but it does feel like a better typing experience for a mobile device.

Tip for anyone over here who wants to ask GPT-4 questions on the cheap. Applying for access to their API will give you access to both chat GPT 3.5 as well as GPT-4 with a different interface. There you pay what you use, which is insanely cheaper with GPT-3.5, and… mildly affordable with GPT-4 so long as you keep contexts short and conversations brief.

Been making use of their playground for months now, probably paid 20 bucks tops for months of use. Worked for my case.

If I need creativity without intelligence, I’ll just use WIzardLM on my 3090.

Do note “Pirating AIs” is not really practical due to the extreme hardware requirements, you’ll hardly find someone willing to foot the bill for free.

Difficult to say right now. While it’s bragged that AI can already “create” games and “webpages”. Current approaches rely heavily on human prompting and trial and error. Plus said dev AIs work best when creating common, simple, short projects. The AI will just auto complete stuff, and if its wrong, well it can’t tell the difference. Actual programs created by humans are multitudes of machines working together in perfect sync. It involves progressive iteration and refactor, as well as requiring many types of languages, data, images, sound, API use, organization, planning, and references (often from closed source programs) if it has any hopes of working.

Something as ambitious as an OS? Given the size of the task, you might as well wait for the singularity when all bets are off.

Solid response.

What the heck does that have to do with watching viral videos on cell phones? We’re talking about a competitor to TikTok. With respect, Linux is like 3% of the desktop market, anything happening on Linux endpoints is noise to the big players.

The bitTorrent protocol is infamous for piracy, in fact you’ll hardly find a common man who doesn’t equate the two together (hearing torrents = pirated media) Even with the full copyright cartel doing their damnest, it’s still available world wide. Also, video streaming on mobile data is everywhere and ISPs responded by fattening up their networks with newer, better, faster tech, like 4g/5g.

Your concerns are reasonable, though there is no precedent. Might be, might not be. Hard to say when one lacks the rulebook.

Torrents have been around for over 20 years and most of the time infamous for its abundance of “linux distros”. Citation needed.

Peertube as you said is the closest equivalent as a video distributor. Technically a similar approach to Peertube would work by using both Torrents and Instance data storage. Now what makes Tik Tok so popular is its algorithm, which mind you, is a tiny wee bit manipulative. In future, Peer Tube might implement something like dedicated sections for vertical videos. But without a significant cultural shift, I’m not seeing an effective Tik Tok clone appear without a lot of noses being turned up.

I see, well, thanks for the announcement. I’ll be sure to keep a close eye.

Displaying images, truly a technological breakthrough for the modern era!

Wait, does this mean that it’s publicly released or exclusively through a bot?

Pardon me if I may inquire, but how exactly does Xiaomi’s gallery fail, at being a gallery application? Morbid curiosity if you will.

I personally find it mildly amusing that picture 1 includes a post of Lemmyverse’s largest Instance announcing it was hacked. (I know it’s true and it’s a good thing that the announcement happened. But still…)

Anyways, with that out of the way. It could be an interesting browser flow, hope people like it!

While I’m not experienced enough to explain the full development stack of an OS. Let me throw my two cents.

It typically goes by writing changes. If its superficial ones, like modern UI in Windows 11, then all they need to do is relaunch explorer/the app etc. Every time they make a change in the code, they then build and try it out.

If its a more internal change, deep into the OS. Typically written in C or another low level language. Then its easier to test the changes in a virtual machine, you write your code, compile, build. And then load it up in the virtual machine to see if the OS doesn’t crash and burn.

Later, after it gets past quality control in the company, (but most often these versions sit in beta for a while to catch problems). It then gets put into the Update servers and rolled out in bulk for mass destribution.

Do note, updates don’t need to include the entire OS. Just packages including the file changes as well as general update busywork.

PS: If anyone replies, feel free to correct me. Details may be sketchy but this is the short of it.

Oh this is is quite interesting. Quite interesting indeed! I approve of this. Seems like it may be exactly what I was looking for.

Much appreciated!

Absolutely peeved that according to laws: Libraries in a digital format literally cannot exist without being illegal. Archive.org only managed to exist as a Library because they enforced DRM which limited available rentals to the books they “bought” and had copies of.

This is because physical Libraries allow you to borrow their own copies, thus you can even read copyrighted material without asking for permission from the rights holder. So they could argue in court that the DRM only emulated the real thing.

Come COVID and they decide to be nice to people by temporarily stripping the rental bullocks. Their reward for a good deed is a sledgehammer to the stomach.

It matters not, books shall be, and remain forever free (For those that need them). One way or another. All I know is that I’ll never buy a book if I’m treated as a criminal.

More interested to see how well it preforms as a base when adding works on top. As one knows, most checkpoints, loras, embeddings and whatnot have stretched the original 1.4/1.5 models to their limits. Finally having a fresh base which preforms nicely as a baseline would be curious to see.