No. However, the FDP are basically terrorists at this point and will stop at nothing to praise the „Schwarze Null“
No. However, the FDP are basically terrorists at this point and will stop at nothing to praise the „Schwarze Null“
France has repeatedly tried to hand over shared control of those nukes to Germany. I’d argue that this alliance is set in stone.
Europe is a nuclear power with second strike capability. „Practically disarmed„ is rather different
Dogs would be a good example for ring species, which show the outer limits of the species definition, if they they occurred in the wild in their many diverse forms. But since they are not, I’d group them as one species still, as their origin is artificial and so are, at least partly, their means of reproduction.
In theory: yes, most likely. In practice? No.
If you can opt out of it, it’s not a tax. It’s an insurance. Taxes pay for everyone.
Since when should country size play a role in government support? There are planes ffs. If your military can operate in the middle of a desert with no utilities, you should be able to support a stable civilian management in rural places.
I’d call that a failed state of the haven’t even got government firefighters. What other basic necessities don’t they have? Are streets also subscription based?
The maturity of a tree does not affect wood density. Density is determined by the stand density the year the ring is added along with factors such as soil moisture, temp etc. the inner rings will have the same density, whether the tree is harvested after a few years or after 200 years provided the tree stayed healthy.
Don’t worry: they will sell you purified air soon enough.
Not every judicial system is built on retaliation. Some are built on rehabilitation and a secure society.
If there is one thing that you can rely on it’s German bureaucracy to be precise in it’s documentation. So I’d trust the numbers here generally….
A lot of these bodies were Ukrainian back then.
He fucked with other rich people’s money, that’s the thing they don’t like.
The phylogenetic results, combined with these other lines of evidence, suggest that the high mortality in 1918 among adults aged ∼20 to ∼40 y may have been due primarily to their childhood exposure to a doubly heterosubtypic putative H3N8 virus, which we estimate circulated from ∼1889–1900. All other age groups (except immunologically naive infants) were likely partially protected by childhood exposure to N1 and/or H1-related antigens.
The Spanish flu apparently had the N1 complex present, to which the 20-40y population wasn’t exposed. At least that’s my limited understanding after skimming the paper.
So far, „sky“ is pretty nice