Yes they actually do. Look up Dodge v. Ford Motor Company. A business must be run in the interests of the shareholders, not the public, not the employees, not even the business itself.
Is it morally right? Fuck no. Is it the law? Unfortunately yes.
Yes they actually do. Look up Dodge v. Ford Motor Company. A business must be run in the interests of the shareholders, not the public, not the employees, not even the business itself.
Is it morally right? Fuck no. Is it the law? Unfortunately yes.
Something similar has happened. Look up Dodge vs. Ford Motor Co where the Michigan Supreme Court ruled that a ceo must operate in the interest of the shareholders not in the interests of the business and it’s employees.
It brought you, didn’t it?
Unfortunately no US official will ever see justice. Domestically, what they’re doing is not seen as a crime and the US will invade Holland before any US official sees the ICJ. That’s not hyperbole, that’s US law.
We’re the biggest kid on the playground and so we don’t play by everyone else’s rules. All with a “What are you gonna do about it” attitude.
In case my tone isn’t clear: I see this as a bad thing.
And any hint of it immediately draws all the people talking about how we should take the moral high road (that’s filled with corpses of people doing the same thing) and not resort to violence or even inconvenient protests
Yes, because more violence is the answer /s
News flash: your thinking is exactly why palestine and friends do not get as much sympathy as they should.
Look at that, it works!
Lynching? Because he’s technically African-American? Wow dude.
I agree with ending the rich and nationalizing their fortunes, but that’s a bad joke.
You’re paying for an ad blocker? uBlock origin is free and fully featured.
Probably, but you’d have to build your name as a reputable pollster (maybe by hiring pollsters from actually reputable polling companies) before turning to this or no one will buy your fake polls.
Despite what the Supreme Court will tell you, corporations aren’t actually people, so you don’t have to worry about dead naming them.
So does giving a rival head of state “the Osama Bin Laden treatment”.
Oct 7 was the pretense Bibi needed to start his genocide. Why would they stop it?
Same thing as George W. Bush (moreso Cheney and Haliburton) wanting war in the middle east and letting 9-11 happen despite actionable intelligence beforehand.
How about we nationalize all three instead, start operating them for the public good?
^^^I ^^^know ^^^this ^^^dream ^^^is ^^^impossible
And then you get a visit from Mossad to send a message to your vice president.
As Catherine Ryan put it: “She’s just an innocent gold digger who got in way over her head”.
You’re thinking of a trilobite
So exactly what was said about Biden in 2020. Except once Biden was elected that pressure evaporated as liberals lost interest in progressive policies.
Apologies, but I was reading them in person so I don’t have links to them. Maybe try on the website for the secretary of state in Nevada?
Having read the forms necessary to get a candidate or initiative on the ballot, I can tell you they are not hard to tell apart if you actually read them. A campaign that is serious about their stated goals would do the basic work of reading the form.
Someone who’s campaign doesn’t bother to read the forms they’re submitting to be included on the ballot should not be considered a serious candidate. Russian stooge or not Stein is incompetent and uncommitted to her espoused ideals.
Fair point, I was unaware of this case.