Judging by the downvotes, a larger part of the Lemmy userbase won’t understand this

Oh, this wasn’t to take from his point, I didn’t even read your comment in the first place. Hilarious reply though. It just triggered another pet peeve of mine

Meet English (American?) News websites where every sentence is their own paragraph, I hate it

Just that Ukraine isn’t a NATO member so there’s no way to trigger article 5

And believe it or not, not many people want to fight in Ukraine, and not many countries want to send their people to fight there

To add to this, Potemkin Buster is a normal move that can be performed at any time on a standing opponent, while Heavenly Potemkin Buster is a super move (meaning it requires a resource to perform) that can only be performed on airborne opponents.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dkS2Nh6v9FU&t=102 for the latest version

If you have nobody to do this with, blame the beasts

Never seen it, it’s solely my favorite because it killed a Nazi.

Huh, I didn’t know I had something in common with Hitler, but we share the same favorite mountain.

Good Old Games Games

$57k is already laughable considering the amount of money deposited… but in gift cards?

You’re already handling cash, aren’t you?

38 years old neo Nazi, arrested at his mother’s place after threatening a sheriff on 4chan because the sheriff stopped them from spreading hate.

Such a loser… in Minecraft :)

I have full IPv6, none of my ports that I haven’t explicitly whitelisted in the firewall can be accessed from the Internet. I can open a host completely, but it’s not default. This is on the most common brand of consumer routers here.

Just because it’s not NATted doesn’t mean there’s no firewall in place.

Please don’t bring in this worn out Reddit joke

I worked in software certification under Common Criteria, and while I do know that it creates a lot of work, there were cases where security has been improved measurably - in the hardware department, it even happened that a developer / manufacturer had a breach that affected almost the whole company really badly (design files etc stolen by a probably state sponsored attacker), but not the CC certified part because the attackers used a vector of attack that was caught there and rectified.

It seemingly was not fixed everywhere for whatever reason… but it’s not that CC certification is just some academic exercise that gives you nothing but a lot of work.

Is it the right approach for every product? Probably not because of the huge overhead power certified version. But for important pillars of a security model, it makes sense in my opinion.

Though it needs to be said that the scheme under which I certified is very thorough and strict, so YMMV.

My router will still block all ports not explicitly allowed for the hosts regardless of protocol, it’s a firewall after all and not just NAT. Just because the host addressable doesn’t mean its ports are reachable.

And the Bible being a justification for state executions is such a horrible excuse.

Which part of the Bible allow that? Is it this “an eye for an eye” thing? And if yes, do those people referring to it also honor the other verses in Leviticus (i.e. not eat shrimp)?

Testing is actually mandatory, what’s not mandatory though is to do it before deploying.

what’s feurking

An optional step in the développement process

Emacs? When there’s ed? Talk about bloat…

Personally I’d love to see more wider usage of S/MIME and/or PGP.

I’d rather see less. https://www.latacora.com/blog/2019/07/16/the-pgp-problem/ is a good summary about the issue and they have a shorter follow-up post about why encrypting mail in general is bad at https://www.latacora.com/blog/2020/02/19/stop-using-encrypted/

What I take issue with actalis, is that they don’t just sign your private key but you actually get the private key from them. It then depends on how much you trust the issuer.

By definition, that key can no longer be considered “private”.