A planned attack is still an attack.

It absolutely isn’t.

They can’t use article 5 preemptively

USA did after 9/11.

USA has had travel advisories for years. You guys can’t figure out how to not shoot people.

Who’s to say the CEO did that?

I’m sure you can see the reason I’m asking these leading questions by now. Extrajudicial killing is bad no matter which side it is. Have a good day and don’t kill anyone.

If they have Plex pass then it’s still fine.

You can use this for any example of self defense though. If we accept that the CEO represented an imminent threat to Luigi and to others,

Who accepts this though? Who determined this?

See my problem with this argument, is if you’re all so determined for Luigi to have a fair trial to defend the position of self defence, shouldn’t that CEO have had a fair trial rather than be extra judicially killed too?

So you agree killing is bad?

Fuck the opinions around here are unhinged.

Why did you want that person killed?

(PS Green Mario did nothing wrong)

He killed a guy. So he did.

That sub generally isn’t a meme sub so it’s not surprising they removed it for non conspiratorial reasons.

Agree. This shit is unhinged.

You can be against the actions of health insurance companies and not be ok with murder.

The romanticisation of a murderer is quite frankly astounding. You can agree with his side of the discussion and not be ok with murder. I don’t think enough people get that.

Why? Dropping the charges would be a court decision so it’s on record that a charge was raised and then dropped. That’s still a court outcome.

Enact martial law, take over all legislation, be a dictator. Job done.

That’s why he’s firing everyone at the top of the military who isn’t a white male.

If the charges were dropped then I don’t think they can be re-litigated. That would be double jeopardy.

Depends. Every hostname accessed? Sure. Every full URL? Not with https being everywhere these days.