Did anybody ever not sour on this testicular sore of a human being?

Hey I actually know this guy

This is all true. Kinda surprising. Memes about Canada are usually pretty incorrect.

This movie was so good until the end. I was like “oh, ok.”.

According to the article, yeah.

“Could any picture sum up our new men’s rights movement better?” the writer asked. “The smirk of a male who’s knows he’s protected by a misogynist sporting establishment enjoying the distress of a woman he’s just punched in the head, and whose life’s ambition he’s just shattered.”

This fucking smug cunt.

What a guy!

Vote like your and your loved ones’ lives depends on it, because they probably do.

Yes.

If they hurt no one else and infringe on no one else’s rights I have no business policing what two consenting adults do with their bodies, time and/or money.

Edit: it should also be totally legal, like all drugs.

Hotdogs, hamburgers, I like a little Shepherd’s pie with my ketchup, tourtière (Quebec mince pie).

Wait but Joe Rogan told me it’s governed by a communist, I don’t know what that is but it can’t be good

Not in Quebec, you have to be over 21, you can’t grow it in your yard, you have to buy it from shitty gov stores that aren’t allowed to tell you anything about the actual products and you can’t smoke it in most public places.

We’re lucky at least that Montreal is Montreal and we can do mostly what we want without being harassed by the pigs but our provincial government is a conservative trash pile that desperately needs to go.

Looks like things are getting pretty stressful in the MAGA/Couch-Fucker party.

Spot on, dude is weird as fuck. I wouldn’t leave him alone with a woman who wasn’t absolutely gushing with consent

I’m part of the rest of society and I agree with their methods. I haven’t been propagandized into thinking protests shouldn’t be disruptive (ignorable). They’ve got you thinking minor inconvenience = utter contempt (which for some reason you chose to write two comments in a row), and that for some reason deserves prison time.

Think about it, really, imagine this was coming from someone you respect enough to make you consider changing your mind; should protests that cause no bodily harm be a criminal offence? Should the people not have a way to truly disrupt the system if our existence is at stake? Is the convenience of the ignorant more important than our survival? I’d love to hear your honest answers to these questions.

I really don’t mind if the mildly inconvenienced thousands of people. If in a functioning democracy our powers are threefold - the vote, the media and protest, and peaceful protest by its very nature is a protest that can be ignored, then no change can be affected by non disruptive protest. In my opinion this isn’t disruptive enough. If we treated this climate crisis with the urgency it deserves then we would take a page out of the European book and block highways with concrete bollards.

Make no mistake, our children will burn and we’re worried about missing a flight.

I think it’s safe to say that if they gave up their freedom for the cause of trying to save us and our descendants from climate catastrophe then they are absolutely morally superior to both of us. The mistake you make is thinking that the law has a single thing to do with moral superiority, it only deals in financial superiority.

What an absolutely tone deaf and patronizing statement. The world is ending but god forbid we inconvenience anyone while trying to do something about it.

Some people failed vocabulary I guess haha

I like throwing these in on purpose, p as in pterodactyl often gets a chuckle.