Also, a portion of that $200 billion likely directly or indirectly is US debt.

Oh my god! How dare someone comment on a discussion forum!!

Nah, it’s more about the capslock, bold font and insults.

You’ll note that I never said anything was right or wrong, in any of my comments.

I mean, you said in your previous comment in this chain that you “guess” it’s morally wrong. And beyond me quoting that I have not claimed you made a moral judgement on this situation.

But alas, I think that it is morally wrong whether or not it was foreseeable, and I do so regardless of what your moral judgement of the situation is (if any). Which, again, seems to really matter to you.

You replied to a comment that said the reuploads are copyright infringement, calling it “Wrong”, citing the TOS.

And in one of your other comments quoting the TOS, you explicitly say that they state the streams are in public domain (a copyright term), when the TOS actually say they are public information.

Gosh, you seem to care about this a lot…

Which is weird, because we seem to be in agreement about a major part:

Is it morally wrong? Sure, I guess.

Was it predictable that it would be recorded and redistributed? Sure. But that still doesn’t make it right.

I’m not quoting anything. I’m saying the TOS say it’s public information, not that they are giving up their copyright (which would be public domain).

Public information is not the same as public domain. They still hold the copyright on the streams, making reuploads illegal.

Also, aside from legality, it’s simply morally wrong. They consented to be watched once live (or, if they enabled recordings, until they delete the VOD), not for it to be shared around on third party sites forever - regardless what Chaturbate put in their TOS to cover their asses.

Public information is not the same as public domain.

@OP When you have continue session on, closing Firefox using burger menu->Quit restores all windows. I assume this will also keep the pins even without continue session.

Nope, this feature has existed forever. They just changed the shortcut, previously it was Ctrl-shift-T for re-opening the last closed tab and Ctrl-shift-N for re-opening the last closed window.

use their ads-machine on fediverse

How would that part work?

Also, if they did join the fediverse, that would significantly reduce user lock-in to their site - which is why they won’t.

You just keep claiming that it is a red flag and ignore my question why it would be one. Why is ‘rare event happens’ a red flag and not just a rare event that happened, as even rare events obviously sometimes do?

(And for the record, I don’t think it’s actually rare. It just usually doesn’t make the news.)

But if he hadn’t had cancer, both being killed and committing suicide would be random. So why would the randomness point to him being killed?

How would him being killed after 20 something years be any less random than him committing suicide?