Court “ordered” end to a strike generally means that any contractual, union or legal protections workers have are forfeited if the strike continues (i.e. folks can be fired, benefits lost, even sued in some cases). This is not uncommon in regimes where the judicial system has been compromised (USA, Israel, etc). That being said… be a real shame if productivity of non-striking workers were to mysteriously plummet to effectively non-existent levels. ;-)

OP’s original post/questions, in case you’re curious. They have quite the history of posting and commenting, receiving substantial downvotes and then deleting or obfuscating. Verdict, troll or puppet account.

In unrelated news, Georgia Court of Appeals sporting all new luxury RVs.

She obviously didn’t realize that a Las Vegas 6, is a prison 9.

Why the closed doors? To quote their own rhetoric, if you’ve got nothing to hide, you’ve got nothing to fear. Oh right, he’s probably bringing receipts from their boss, Putin.

From a group of people that thinks transparency is having a set list of prices for their rulings.

More information here: https://lemmy.world/post/3985694

US Healthcare Industry would like a word…

Uh-oh, looks like someone is going to have to buy Clarence Thomas another RV to get out of this one!

While I sincerely hope so, possibly unpopular opinion… Lemmy will have to offer a lot more than “Not Reddit”. It’ll have to build up as a primary destination for a lot of “content of substance” and culture around creating and nurturing it (just cross posting from Reddit will not cut it). It may have to offer communities and opportunities Reddit bans or suppresses, although there should be some red lines there. And, like all Federated technologies, it will have to actively work to reduce friction for potential users.