Fox just used it to back their generational culture war theme for another segment
From Digg to Reddit to Lemmy
Fox just used it to back their generational culture war theme for another segment
I’ve been using mine since Christmas
It’s amazing how capable this thing is with such a tiny screen
Using a term describing people with a handicap as an insult is a shitty thing to do
How about just not using the slur?
Former UFC champ, Sean Strickland
Peanuts are the hand grenade of allergies - you don’t have to consume them to react if you are allergic
Everything else is relatively safe if you can keep from eating, or otherwise come into contact with it
source: father of a child who has many food allergies
He’s of the opinion that the NDP is gaining enough popularity to at least overtake the Liberals.
This is hubris
An eye for an eye would see rockets hit Moscow and St Petersburg
Well, that was a twist ending.
I route all my sensitive chatting to personal texts to avoid the scenario you and your coworkers encountered
You would expect that not having a provincial sales tax would bring the cost of necessities down
Muslim groups have backed the NDP at the local level before
There’s not much point in backing them nation-wide since they just don’t have enough broad support to form a government
On most issues, Muslims would naturally back conservative agendas, but immigration and other minority issues draw them left at the polls
Canada Drives moved to a finance only model too. To even look up cars on their site, you need to submit a finance pre-approval
And was probably just waiting for you to lose your cool so he could make it much worse for you
RBG was a dem, as was Feinstein - they’re all the same when it comes to not giving up their positions
Term limits need to be put in place
Passing a cop is illegal?
I think that’s an awkward (and sovcit) way of saying that even though she is a lawyer, she isn’t acting as a lawyer in this instance
Imagine having to deal with this crap. How does the “lawsuit” make it far enough for the defendant to be served? Or is that something that happens without any actual review by the courts?
“As such harm is a very grievous trespass, i, shall claim remedy in the amount of $500,000 for such trespass plus $5,000 a day for as long as the trespass continues,”
Could/should the journalist just uno reverso Ababi and claim trespass damages of $1M + $10K a day?
That is way too small a car to be in when an elephant decides to go ham on your ride
I can’t tell if you’re being satirical or serious