Viewed from a historical perspective, it’s hard to see how the non-incombent didn’t have a really good advantage.

Hindsight can always be 20/20, and think a Buttigieg/Kelly ticket would have done a bit better. Buttigieg has been in charge of infrastructure, which I believe has been well run. He’s from the rust belt, and is more familiar with the working class vs the candidate with California Progressive with a DA background.

Ultimately though, I think the fault lies with the Democratic Party hijacking the primary process.

… you were saying?

deleted by creator

Executing the trolley problem in your garden.

Adding this in here. Cranefly pack represent!

As an aging millennial, I am surprised by how the process of time works.

Like you spend your life acquiring skills and using your knowledge in an ever expanding cornucopia of experiences.

Then followed by a gradual decline to be left only with your memories of who you once were. But then you realize you were only a small part of the existence of others, and ultimately the universe. Yep, the thought of faculties diminishing over time is enough to put the one into an extensional crisis.

I sure hope not. Harris is a sure fire way to a Trump presidency.

How about Mark Kelly?

Well done

OMG, Pareto analysis… so sexy.

Oh, I’ll have to check out peertube. Thanks for the information.

I wonder if some form of bit torrent client may be of use here.

I’m not sure what comment to reply to, but I feel obligated to remind people that the sun is a fusion reaction.

EVs

Also, just cause they allot the land doesn’t mean they will build it. Now excuse me, while go read the article.

Well put