No ones brought up the specific signs until now? Everyone has been saying there isn’t a minimum. Read the conversation? Who’s asked for a sign?

Reread my post, I said most post it there, there is a lot of personal accountability to know the rules of the road of places you travel too.

And your defense is that one exists so another can’t…? Shit take.

See law A, see law B if they want to specific.

And yes it is a limit, if you’re impeding, you’re below that limit. Some places also have adjustable signs to account for these potential scenarios.

You seem to fall in the category of people that need specific posted limits, since the concept of variable speeds seems to be lost on you. Just because it’s not posted on a sign, doesn’t mean it doesn’t exist… shit take dude. Read your legislation, as well as the legislation of any places that you plan to travel too. Because you will be surprised by them amount of mundane shit you’ve missed and could be breaking the law without knowing.

And ignorance is never an excuse dude.

Maybe brush up on your traffic laws dude

Kansas allows ANY municipality to set specific minimum road limits… look at that!

Again, can you provide a municipality or even a state that doesn’t have a minimum speed law? I’ve even made it easier for you.

Every municipality has some form of minimum speed law, do you want me to list every single one? You even provide an example of places they are used… and want to argue they don’t exist…? What?

Can you provide an example of a place without any minimum speed laws?

And on certain roads they set a specific limit, other times its blanket low amount to make things easier, or as you said, a non specific law, so they can ticket you for essentially anything instead…

Every municipality has a minimum speed limit so you can’t just have someone driving 1km/h down the road creating a rolling blockade. Most are posted on the entrance into the municipality.

There are reasons for both sides to have and not have specific laws.

Cornish hens/chickens?

You seriously thought a virtual machine would be a buyable device…?

That’s an even worse take lmfao.

It’s a KVM switch? How much specs do you need?

A more realistic metric would be used books (also reflects the quality of all but brand new fresh books which are a rarity obviously), but you can’t quantify that price, so yes using new is disingenuous, but go off on a rant I guess? I think it’s a great idea, but let’s not kid ourselves that people would actually be spending that amount on books. It’s great for a feel good story though, I’ll give you that.

They wouldn’t have spent 60k on books over that time, they’ve only saved that much because the books were free. If they had to pay for the books they would have been more selective and less liberal in the amount.

Spending $150 a week is just a lot of money to spend on books, it’s only that much because of the free price tag, so it’s extremely disingenuous to use that amount as people wouldn’t realistically spend that.

The population of the world is constantly going up, of course the numbers will go up, it should be surprising when it starts declining.

So your intention wasn’t to have a conversation in your original comment?

And it was 30 minutes from your first reply… as well? You’ve done the same to me dude, but I haven’t insulted or attacked you, I’ve defended my points.

Also, the apps auto refresh, you can just see a notification pop up… what’s with the insults?

Ironic considering how fast you responded to me.

And I’ve only pointed out that there was more they could have done, and they claimed they would do anything.

I’m sorry that trying to have a conversation about this upsets you so, but why do people always try to derail conversations that don’t align with their (in this case) objectively wrong views? There is a hell of a lot more they could have done to protect the land, and they claimed they would, and failed on that. Why does this upset you so much?

They could rent one, or patrol it more often than they did. They made a claim, and failed to follow through on it, and this isn’t the first time.

We promised we’d use every legal tool at our disposal to protect this land from bullies like

Thats literally what they promised to do with the money they fleeced from people though….

We promised we’d use every legal tool at our disposal to protect this land from bullies like…

They did less than that actually, it’s this premise that they broke and is what I was talking about, they made a claim, they didn’t even do the bare minimum to protect it, when they said they would do anything.

Look at every single discussion that missed this detail and says they did the bare minimum, that’s NOT what they promised to do with the money. Lots of people knew this was marketing and a waste of money, and were pointing this out, they never intended to protect it, just looked everything else they took your money and laughed. And that’s all I said.

They said they would do anything possible, I’m calling out they did the bare minimum, or less when they said they would do ANYTHING. This is the extremely important detail everyone seems to be ignoring, they PROMISED to do anything possible, which they failed to do.

Just because I have a different opinion or see things in a. Different light doesn’t make me arguing in bad faith, that’s a fallacy people use to derail from their circle jerks.