Pineapples are a freak fruit though.They grow on some kind of weird weed like some kind of joke.

Don’t forget Calvados n_n

Also apples used to be small, tart, and acidic.

You wouldn’t eat them as a dessert but as a basis for brewing alcohol.

It’s wild how much fruits changed in recent times.

So much so that most zoo are stoppimg giving them to animals and switched to more leafy greens. They have gotten so sugary that they promoted tooth decay and obesity.

Nope, just plain ole terrorism.

potato potato

ilk means kind in this instance.

They should issue guidelines that Meta could follow if they chose to.

There should be no arrangement further than that.

Let me fuck my way to virginity.

I looked at the definition of addiction and it could fit.

But alcohol is paychoactive and addictive. Lead is non of those things.

Except it’s the kind of poison that takes decades to kill you. And it’s bad for braincells too.

This is the whole concept of any war of attrition though.

I believe Bill Maher could suck the fun out of a bouncy castle by his mere presence.

Oui.

Yeah ofc females is an issue. We have the word “women” which is more specific and less loaded.

And no, tits aren’t sexual by essence. No body parts are and it’s all social constructs.

• Peoples who don’t traditionally cover their chests don’t tend to sexualize breasts either.
• At some point in France, ankles used to be sexualised. It seems silly now, doesn’t it?

Plus lil kids tend to already see lots of tits since they feed on them.

Yes I am weird but I’m also right 😉

The word females is an issue

We have this neat little concept called “women” that is specific to humans and also refers to a social role.

Using “female” is - by opposition - quite dehumanizing.

but if they got their tits out in public in-front of lil kids…. Thats ok???

First and foremost, kids spent their first few monthes suckling on tits. They kinda know what they look like. Or should breastfeeding women hide their breast from their infants? 🤣

Then sexualising parts of the human body is a social construct:

• Peoples who don’t usually cover their chests don’t tend to sexualise breasts either.
• At some point it was considered inappropriate to show your ankles for a woman. It seems silly now doesn’t it?

So since human breasts (and any body part by extension) aren’t intrinsically sexual, there should be no issue showing them to anyone, kids included.

(Otoh I am obv not condoning any interactions with any kind of sexual intent with minors or young adults with a significant age gap)

Youre weird af

I am but I am also right 😉

Incel has moved in English from “involutary celibate” to mysoginistic.

I’m not saying you are but you sure speak like one…

Calling women females is at best weird and insensitive for example.

Plus the “think of the children” that works is reducing exposure (no ads, no sponsorships, etc) and making it look uncool.

Which is does conversion and checks notes nice.

I think I conveyed the wrong message. imho both versions are very good.

The older has a slight death trap energy while the newer one could be a bit slimmer.