You can in the newer entries I think? I haven’t played em but I heard my friend mention it
You can in the newer entries I think? I haven’t played em but I heard my friend mention it
Are you assuming I’m buying pokémon games?
I’m playing stuff I actually enjoy like Cassette Beasts. I’m hyped for the upcoming Beastieball too. I tried TemTem but it felt too much “Mobile” for me for a lack of better terms.
I’m pointing out that it’s funny to me that fans of Palworld got angry at the very thing Pokémon fans got angry at Gamefreak for (Namely, spreading their team thin on Little Town Hero)
Enshittification marches on
I will live with my mistakes
I hate the comments there…
Not a Nintendo game
Executions are barbaric period
Your teaching professor likely misinterpreted the fair use doctrine’s wording. Apparently this is a common mistake. I made sure to look this up.
Both Nintendo and Pocketpair are Japanese companies and their copyright laws are MUCH more harsh. In fact Japan even lacks concepts of “Fair use”
Men will blame anything else for their problems before ever admitting that toxic masculinity might be the cause of their problems
It’s also tbh very much just “Super Mario Bros but more” in terms of well… Everything. If you like SMB1 and want new levels, play SMB2 Lost Levels.
(What their mothers are)
It’s reminiscent of “wario master of disguise” which imo is good enough
And Japanese copyright law is one of the strictest in the world
Daedream and Depresso are a tad generic to me tbh. It blends in with the countless similar designs of “blobby goblin fairy” we have seen not only from Pokémon but in fact many other franchises. Reminds me of Sleepmon from digimon. I think you might like Sleepmon
I can see the appeal but usually such designs are salvaged by having them change into more unique forms later.
I’d be happy with just backwards compatibility
deleted by creator
Certainly won’t fly in Japanese courts
Interesting. Reminds me of wario master of disguise
(They’re dating)