exactly. If you want to kill someone, just use a car. Obligatory fuck cars!

He should have used a car to run him down.

The picture only shows

room temperature IQ. Blocked.

This is the related incident:

https://www.spiegel.de/panorama/bildung/fu-berlin-uni-beschaeftigte-schildern-attacken-durch-pro-palaestina-aktivisten-a-39d1d797-b2c5-47cf-8b5b-9914cfdd7408

Slogans and the triangle of the Palestinian terrorist organization Hamas were sprayed on the facade of the historic building.

You make your judgement.

From the article:

Some, but not all, of the allegations would correspond to criminal charges in Germany; almost none of them have been brought before a criminal court.

They just need to take them to a criminal court and let the judge decide

Unfortunately in germany, france and uk, there’s a big chunk of people that participate in protests against israel and in the protests in favor of turning the country who took them into a caliphate. Anyway i don’t think this article is true since it’s not being reported anywhere.

They are not free however from consequences, i.e. getting hit in the mouth,

I would say that this is wrong. If you get hit in the mouth for something you say, than it’s not freedom of speech. It’s the law of the strongest.

Example: You wouldn’t hit a UFC fighter for something he said to you on a 1 to 1, however you would beat him if you are 10 against him. This is the law of the strongest.

I don’t believe in absolut free speech. I think that it needs to have limits in it (very well defined limits), and there should be consequences for certain things. And the consequences need to be enforced in a way to counter them, like for example if you say hate crap then you should be forced to contribute to anti-hate orgs.

now canada needs to invest in proper public transportation, so in the future people wouldn’t need to buy a car just for day to day life.