

The wording of legislation is how legislation works?


The wording of legislation is how legislation works?


I suspect what will actually happen is this bill will go nowhere. If it starts to go somewhere, business interests will step in and squash it because of the many, many, many problems it would cause.


That in itself introduces numerous security problems, still incredibly stupid and all this surveillance data makes for a hacker goldmine. Not like governments have a great IT security track record.


VPNs are needed for way more than people working from home. It’s hard to understate how spectacularly stupid banning VPNs would be in terms of business alone, never mind all the other problems it would cause.


Banning VPNs would be an unmitigated disaster and anyone who suggests that it’s a good idea has absolutely no idea what they’re talking about and should never be allowed to make tech policy again because they are a massive idiot.
Businesses, institutions, and even the government itself all require the use of VPNs to remain secure. VPNs are vital to functioning IT infrastructure everywhere.
Additionally, such a move wouldn’t even stop people from accessing porn (which isn’t even what VPNs are for), all it would really do is break IT security everywhere.


Physical books?


You might also enjoy VVVVV and Meatboy.


This truly is the dumbest timeline.


I’m not sure I’ve ever heard the term “bonkers” used in that way before.


How about have a robust social safety net and living wages so people can afford to have families and get them healthcare when they need it? Huh? How about doing that???


Gross. I hate this anti-science bullshit.


gold-detailed custom wraps.
Haha, gross.


Turns out the headline is bullshit and they never sold it to begin with.


That’s a fucked up headline then.


I guess because of the wildly misleading title?


What would the motivation be?


“Fuck your stupid bleeding stomach!”
-Costco apparently


Cowards.


Again? What are the odds???
FFS, so what’s a keyboard that isn’t shitty and invasive?