(although github eventually somewhat complied unfortunately)

I do, just like how VPN companies, Github, etc do

Removed by mod

I’m more alarmed when a government does it, but regardless, yea his motive might not actually be what he claims, it doesn’t really matter though since censorship is still bad

You know that Twitter isn’t banned in Turkiye and India because they complied with their requests for censure,

Yes, and I oppose that.

since you know, those are right wing governments run by strong men

Could be, could be he got fed up with it, idk.

Funny how free speech becomes the issue just when the requests come from governments whose ideology don’t align with this particular clown’s.

Um, no? Free speech was an issue then too. Someone can do good things and bad things. Censoring is bad, refusing to censor even if its just in one case is good.

you’re banned if you correctly call someone cis gendered.

Yes that’s bad

I don’t know what you’re misunderstanding, censorship is bad, its bad when Musk does it, and its really bad when a government does it. Because governments can shoot you and throw you in jail for not complying.

Well, from what I understand when X appoints a legal representative they will then be held responsible for refusing to ban. Is that wrong?

Idk, not my place to judge

good to know

sadly I happen to know the demographics of this site is mostly 25+

B. If we accept a Chinese version of Google then there’s no reason we can’t accept a Brazilian version of X.

You understand Google is banned in China because they wouldn’t accept censure right?

Don’t speak out against the mob on here, it’s honestly worse than Reddit. “Censorship of political opponents is bad actually” is an unpopular take on here

They’re talking about Bolsonaro. But yeah when you use the same insults against all the people you disagree with it makes it hard to tell them apart

That’s not what the article says, the article says it’s because X refused to ban users and because of that. Not just because of that

No, you’re still misunderstanding what’s being done. ${server_service} is an injected string, the string is the whole contents of the file. That file is not stored locally on the server, except through being injected here(by a terraform file template). And no, printf won’t be any better than echo because its not format string, and I don’t want any formatting from printf applied to it.

I’m reading this and interpreting that line 27 of that script is

And your interpretation is wrong. Line 27 is actuallly

sudo echo "${server_service}" > /lib/systemd/system/server.service

${server_service} is read from the file I posted in the 2nd image. Since it was a test script I hadn’t bothered implementing any escaping tools, I wanted to make sure terraform allowed this first.

there is no purpose other than legacy of having replaced other commands

terraform(really is just a injection of a file() into a shell script)

I don’t think I did(though sometimes I do accidentally because of the Jeroba app UX)

No, because neither of those are the inputs. The input was the systemd file in the image. The whole command was not printed in the error, only surrounding context. The single-quote was indicating the ending of that context(because it was the end of the line) printed by the error.

The same thing was done with `)' on the first line of error

I don’t disagree, but this time its my fault