, it’s really difficult for someone to use more than two at the same time
Skill issue
, it’s really difficult for someone to use more than two at the same time
Skill issue
I think in your fervor to make sure everyone knew you were absolutely not attracted to children, like at all, in anyway, that’s crazy why would you even suggest that hahaha — that you maybe were unable to see the point I was making.
Calling it the Royal We was the joke. The original We was a reference to ‘we as a society’, which you got extremely defensive about because you interpreted it as me calling you a pedophile.
The US military is in 75% of the countries on earth but it’s definitely not the largest empire the world has ever seen * wink wink *
I think he renders them unconscious so they’re more like objects.
That is the joke, yes
It was a royal we
I’m not claiming anything about you. I’m just stating your rebuttal is anecdotal evidence and there is social incentive for you to make the claim that you are.
Woody Allen and Michael Jackson a few years before that
Both continued to produce commercially successful works well into the 2010s
Fucking R. Kelly got arrested in 2002. You think no one gave a shit?
A whole year before the remix to ignition became a huge hit in '03. All my friends in middle-school loved that song.
Raping children was something that was generally permitted if you were considered high status enough.
Anecdotal evidence which could also be construed as you protecting your social status. I can’t accept your rebuttal.
Stray Cat Blues by the Rolling Stones was a very popular song about having sex with a 15 year old, but for live performances they switch it to 13 year old, the live audience loves it.
People still love David Bowie even though he raped Lori Maddox when she was 15.
I remember my dad talking at a family bbq about how hot he thought middle school girls were. Everyone else laughed along with him.
People were pretty open about it before the internet created an environment where they could be held accountable publicly.
In 2005 we thought that that stuff was cool
Hope this finally solves the issue of poor PC ports that have bene plaguing Steam. Glad to see the government step in with funding to address this.
Imagine the other timeline where we’re all meming the moment his head transformed into a pink mist in front of all those cameras
True, but they can still get you (especially during Puberty) horny.
I think thats what these kids are actually complaining about. They’re used to getting turned on and immediately being able to satisfy themselves on their phones. But during a movie they’ve got to wait another hour before they can releave themselves and that’s frustrating for them.
I guess it depends on the effects action could have on you.
If you’re the type to get really pumped and hyped at action, something you do enjoy but maybe not all the time, then inserting it into a movie that you wanted to give you some other emotion would take away from the overall experience because it’s hard to get out of the juiced up state of mind.
So if sex scenes make you horny, and maybe you’re conditioned to get immediate relief from that feeling because of porn, then I can see why that could hinder your enjoyment of the overall movie.
There is value in showing third parties are growing more popular. It’s the first step that needs to happen for a third party candidate to become truely viable.
I can understand that now that we have access to easy-direct–instant-proper porn that sex scenes are less appealing to the majority of people.
When I was a kid they would definitely include a sex scene just so that people looking to jerk off would be willing to watch or buy.
How often do you hear about a father abusing his daughter and thebres tof the family knows and does nothing, even defending the dad when the girl comes forward?
Lots of humans prioritize stability over what’s right.
Apparently she came from a pro-life family and her mother asked why they doctors didn’t help the miscarriage along