Ha. I was wondering why my comment was still in the positive for so long.

And please don’t take my responses as I don’t care. I do care, but i need to balance the needs of my family.

I just don’t think EVs are there yet in terms of feasibility. I considered them, but it’s just not for me yet. It will be at some point.

Absolutely. So tell.me why YOU think I should not have gotten a Jeep. I can tell you, though, that your opinion didn’t factor into my purchase decision.

That’s right. Ma freedom allowed me to purchase a gas guzzling Jeep instead of a hybrid or EV. Viva USA!

Thank you! I worked at Staples as an Easy Tech (2006) and we were required to search desktops for pedophile materials so we could report them to authorities when found. I never found any myself but that was policy back then.

You should never use bad examples. It just makes your comment look stupid.

He may be referring to the upcoming Virginia elections on November 7th. The polls favor the GOP, and a shutdown would have angered Democrats to slaughter the GOP. This CR avoids a doomsday scenario for the Governor’s party.

I dont think raising minimum wage will help. It just forces the service to raise the cost of the delivery fee. I don’t know the answer to the affordability crisis, but it ain’t that!

I come in peace, because you wanted an honest answer/real conversation. .

The presumption of innocence died with the invention of social media. It’s guilty until proven innocent now.

I was referring to Matt Araiza, not Brian Banks.

Then if there’s plenty of evidence, then he will be convicted in a court of law. When that happens, I will call him guilty, but not until then.

Wasn’t there a football player that was accused of his rape at a party and everyone thought he was guilty, until the proof of his innocence came out. These threads might not look good in the future.

I wish I could give you a gold award.

From what I saw, even the Democrat AG of New Mexico won’t support or defend this in court.

According to the article from the nytimes, she raised money by asking for tokens in exchange for their suggestions to perform sex acts.

Edit: or was it wapo? I read it somewhere that she was accepting money in exchange for sex acts.

My comment was about how she feels this is an invasion of privacy not about the legality of the situation. She posted these on the internet with her own free will for money. She didn’t have a problem posing for them.when it benefited her. Now, though, it’s a problem.

Personally, I have no problem with her wanting to explore her sensuality. Good for her. I stop feeling sorry for her when she then declares it an invasion of privacy.

To quote Raouldook

"That’s true but still, you can’t exactly claim “invasion of privacy” if you filmed and streamed it live to the Internet yourself.

People should not film it if they don’t want others to see it. That’s the golden rule of porn"

I find it funny that they used the term “invasion of privacy”. She and her hubby went onto Chatterbate (I don’t know the exact website name) and took tips from others to perform (according to my morning paper). That’s a public display. And the fact that it didn’t dawn on her that this could be out there is astonishing. I know if I ever put a picture on the internet, it’s there FOREVER, and just because I’m a nobody doesn’t mean someone out there archived it for later.

Edit: I changed leaked to invasion of privacy.

So you’re okay with it being fine for a White House administration telling tech companies what they can and can’t allow? If so, then just wait until.the next Republican gets into the White House. You may not like this because it’s against Bidens White House, but this ruling will prevent Trump from doing it as well…if he somehow got back into office…which won’t happen, but still. It’s a precedent.

This is actually common. My brother in law lost his state job when he enlisted in the National Guard. They claimed it was for another reason, but his issues with managing didn’t start until he announced he had enlisted. He sued, won and got his job back after boot camp. His first day back he turned in his 2 Weeks notice. For these cases it’s just proving the point and winning the right to go.out on their own terms.