We can also call it “freedom of not letting dangerous and genocidal ideology spread”, but that would be more annoying to use :(

I obviously don’t support free verbal/physical violence.

Unless it’s for defense Or against active nazis Or this kind of stuff…

0:)

oh thank you very much for your explanation! it’s much clearer now :)

can someone explain to me what is this “rule” I see a lot in posts titles? sometimes mixed with other words? I’m having a hard time to understand its meaning

That comment is neither helpful nor interesting criticism. It’s not even pleasant to read.

• I don’t understand why you say I’m Eve.
• I don’t have any formation in cybersecurity, so no “lectures to go back and watch”
• It’s not even a school project of any sort
• I was not planning on asking chatGPT, but I’m sure its answer would actually be more helpful for my problem than your comment

I used Alice and Bob because I read stuff with this scenario and liked it, that’s all…

Maybe you thought that warning/advice would be helpful, but for me at least, it just sounds very paternalistic.

that’s interesting indeed! thank you very much!

Alright thank you for your reply, I’ll think about it :) maybe having a vérification that can be done in any computer and any amount of time is just not possible for my use case

Indeed, I didn’t think of that. And would it be possible to allow only one check and destroy/make the information of B unusable after this check?

Thank you for your reply!