Seems pretty selfish to me
/s
Seems pretty selfish to me
/s
In a commercial situation like a monster truck exhibition, there is president that the operator can be held liable for foreseeable mechanical failure that injures people.
This wasn’t a kid playing with his mom’s gun. It was a commercial production.
Yes, you should that’s like the number one rule of handling actual firearms.
I feel like we are minimizing the fact they were using actual fully functional fire arms on a set which is absolutely not normal.
Edit: Lemmy doesn’t support LaTex
I just want to objectively point out that OPs math is fairly accurate.
What Percentage of Americans Own Guns? 40%, or approximately more than 82,000,000 Americans own guns.
So, approximately 0.0006695% of gun owners experienced a negligent discharge that resulted in death.
If you’re doing a scene where you throw acid on somebody is the person throwing the acid supposed to check to make sure it’s not actually acid before they throw it?
Should they check to make sure the knife they’re about to stab someone with is actually a prop?
I think any reasoning person would say the answer is “yes”. Ultimately you are responsible for your own actions.
Think about it like this, remove the context of this being a movie. Your friend hands you a gun and says it’s not loaded, should you check before firing the gun at someone? Your friend hands you a bucket of “not acid” and tells you to throw it on someone. Do you check that it’s really not acid first?
It seems like the suggestion is that the film set is removing these base line responsibilities for our own actions and I don’t think that’s very reasonable.
Yeah tbh image embeds were a mistake IMO.
Coms?
Unless there have been some major advancements recently I don’t think much of this is going to be running fully locally.
I think you are depressed :/
Honestly the fact that it has code that says “under condition X, don’t save the user” is concerning in and of itself. I wouldn’t trust this thing in the first place.
You know times were tough when people were convulsing recreationally.
It’s just Pokémon but if the series grew up with the fanbase instead of stagnating on the age group it did.
It’s a really good “monster collector” game with solid gameplay and a mature story.
I played ~30hrs and there is still a lot to go.
That being said, it’s not AAA by any means.
Boulders Gare 3 doesn’t really even have a concept of grinding. There are no procedurally generated encounters and each battle can only happen once.
You could say doing all the side quests and exploring the side areas is a type of grinding but it’s really just “content” IMO.
… once they killed Glenn off. I’m reading the comics now years later and it’s much more enjoyable
I have some bad news for you…
Ahh, owning a chicken coop suggested to me you own property. Not many landlords are going to be ok with stuff like that.
Honestly, owning a house/property puts you in a better spot than a lot of people. What state are you in?
That’s not really “like” and IVR, that’s literally an IVR.
Most IVR software is programmable to say/do whatever you need it to.
VSCode with the VIM mode plugin is kind of the best of both worlds.
Not really because these are open source projects. The one that is easier to develop for will likely get more features which leads to more users.
That being said, Java was a questionable choice IMO.