• 2 Posts
  • 30 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: August 8th, 2023

help-circle
















  • Why would I use anything that runs my homelab traffic through centralized servers? It kinda defeats my whole purpose in “privatizing” my data. They say they don’t collect data blah blah blah but nobody can be 100% sure what goes on in their own servers.

    I really like the idea of combining VPN with Syncthing-like connectivity but not at the cost of privacy. If they would just allow an opt-out from using their servers and not requiring signing up for an account I would be all over it.

    Unless I’m mistaken, I’ll be sticking with my Wireguard with one port forwarded through my router.




  • shiftymccool@lemm.eetoSelfhosted@lemmy.worldUseful apps to self-host
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Depends on your router. I have an Asus and it has a free ddns option through their domain. I point my Wireguard client at this address and never think of it again. That way, the only port that’s open on your router is a Wireguard port and they don’t respond to sniffing.

    If that’s not a possibility, I had a ddns service before that for like $2/month


  • shiftymccool@lemm.eeOPtoSelfhosted@lemmy.worldFile Browser vs Nextcloud
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    Well, I’ve had a fully functioning Traccar instance running all night and most of the day and I’m sad to say that I’m less than impressed.

    The tracking isn’t quite as bad as OwnTracks but not nearly as good as PhoneTrack. Instead of showing me that I randomly went to a city several miles away, I just spent some time in a field by my house instead of walking down the road next to it.

    I’ve kept PhoneTrack running in tandem and the comparison, in terms of accuracy and battery usage, leaves no question. I tried everything I could think of to post a screenshot of my battery usage but “image is too large” was all I got even for an 18k image. So, after a day-ish of running both, my battery stats in Android show:

    • Traccar Client: 36% (top of the list, 15 hours background, 1 min screen time)
    • …several other apps, including those with a lot more screen time
    • PhoneTrack: 1% (background 8 hours)

    I think it’s PhoneTrack’s “significant motion” setting that makes the difference here. If Traccar gets this feature (or already has it and I’m missing it…) that will solve a few problems.

    If I’m missing something with Traccar here, somebody please set me to rights. It seems strange that the only setting in the Traccar client to save battery is to set the interval longer, thereby killing accuracy. PhoneTrack seems to have solved this problem, and it’s “just a Nextcloud app”, Traccar is dedicated to this functionality, I feel like it should have more options. 🤷‍♂️

    Looks like I’m sticking with PhoneTrack for now which means my Nextcloud instance has been relegated to app platform instead of all-in-one file manager.

    EDIT: Didn’t notice the wake lock setting, trying it for a bit with that off to see if that helps