As a neutral nation you need to have some way to ensure that neutrality as there is no NATO or other group of nations to have your back.
Hence the military spending.
As a neutral nation you need to have some way to ensure that neutrality as there is no NATO or other group of nations to have your back.
Hence the military spending.
Pretty sure it’s sideways France in this case. It may even say GIGN beneath the flag.
Ryan McBeth mentioned in his video (13min) them not disclosing receiving funds from a foreign backed entity was, indeed, the legal issue.
The issue often is that, just because it’s outwardly frowned upon, it doesn’t mean it won’t happen behind closed doors.
Which isn’t to say any of your relatives are bad people, but a culture where speaking up is frowned upon encourages victims to hide their abuse.
People have caught onto what they really mean by “anti-sjw”, so they’ve moved onto the next buzzword. And then the next, and the next.
Whatever it takes to keep their plausible deniability in front of the media that they aren’t simply racist. Gotta keep that mainstream appeal.
It’s the latest anti-sjw boogeyman
On Samsung I have “deep sleeping apps”, which basically kills any app put on that list when I turn off my phone.
It will also prevent notifications and such, but it is useful for anything I don’t care running in the background.
Don’t be so harsh
there is somewhat realistic possibility for browser fingerprinting
A fun website to visit: https://www.amiunique.org/fingerprint
Most sane take in this whole thread.
Some of y’all get a little conspiratorial.
The Garfield comic is actually an edit made after this tweet:
But do you pronounce it “sakso-foni” or “sak-sofoni”
Ah, like so. I thought you were referring to the article on the Patreon website with your initial comment, rather than the article in the post itself.
You’re right, the article is wrong. “Gross revenue” makes no sense.
Which is contradictory to the first line of the linked essay.
Is it though?
Current sign-ups are likely through Patreons own payment system, which will stay as it is. It would be like signing up in the web version, then going on to use the iOS app. That wouldn’t suddenly subtract 30% from a payment Apple has no control over.
fyi: it’s SKU, not “skew”.
On top of invalidating the lived experience of a cis-woman because this Olympic boxer with more muscle than most men looks kinda masculine in some pictures.
So much for the “we can always tell”.
It’s a double whammy of bigotry.
We’ll find someone else to blame, like women!
Wait, no–