It is the company’s responsability for people dumping the plastic. If they made as much publicity for responsible disposal as they do for comsumption of their products, people would be better. They can also produce less or in better recipients.
The company makes the plastic bottles, which don’t need to be plastic, and then uses marketing to promote consumption. The people are not to blame for being exploited by the scheme of the corporations. If this company stopped existing tomorrow, I’m sure people would consume less just from the lack of advertisement.
For tis topic I love the discussion of Rational Animations. Here is one of the videos of the topic:
Humanity was born way ahead of its time. The reason is grabby aliens.
Have you ever played Divinity Original Sin II? How would you compare it to Solasta?
We are living the plot from PsychoPass
Maybe they would like nostr more
Look, I understand AI, in general, not just LLM, is very powerful and research is needed to develop better models. However, people and media need to stop presenting every random research project as the NEW BIG THING, as that will just make non-technical people confused and lead to unnecessary hysteria.
Stop hammering not-nails with not-hammers.
Unfortunately, death is not a case of balance. Any action done with the intent to cause unnecessary harm is evil. However, you could argue that killing someone that tortures many others is less evil.
Recently, I have also been seeing people talking about Anubis (GitHub) to block bots.
Weigh the soul of incoming HTTP requests using proof-of-work to stop AI crawlers.
In most cases, you should not need this and can probably get by using Cloudflare to protect a given origin. However, for circumstances where you can’t or won’t use Cloudflare, Anubis is there for you.
tbf javascript is not a programming language, it is the language of the devil
isn’t nostr overrun with cryptobros?
Junior compiler writers exist.
You can have a junior write compiler code, but you won’t have a junior compiler writer. It’s a very specific niche topic which does not have the demand for this.
They don’t teach CLIs and git and debugging in uni.
Well, they do. Version control is extremly useful for doing projects especially in groups and debugging is a necessary tool for building systems. These are not the main topic of the courses, but they are taught and practically mandatory.
Just because they are equivalent for the labguage does not mean they are interchangeable. I may choose to use single or double quotes in specific cases and need that change to be visible, even if the language rules say it is indifferent.
This is the obvious one: The way the string is written changes, but its content remains the same. There is nothing to highlight for SemanticDiff.
Moreover, my point was about how they phrase it. It seems they dismiss what the code means to developer by mentioning “content” and discarding “the way the string is written”.
Usually my models only store data, meaning the files that contain them don’t have much code. The decision also depends on the tools you are using and who you are working with. I would fallback to the rule of separation of responsabilities and write a new class for the purpuse of serializing the model (which could and should also serialize similiar models). This way is universal in any language and can easily be understood by future you and colleages.
The most obvious option: highlight what changed, the whole string. If you changed the string from interpolated to non-interpolated, the meaning of the whole string changed; it is no longer a method to concatenate variables, it has become a literal string.
Same for the example of single to double quotes. In some languages, double quotes are only used in specific contexts, so its use changes the meaning of the code. The post seems to dismiss this fact too easily.
I guess no one deserves Fundamental Rights, anymore.