An employee can also use Form W-4 to tell you not to withhold any federal income tax. To qualify for this exempt status, the employee must have had no tax liability for the previous year and must expect to have no tax liability for the current year.
https://www.irs.gov/taxtopics/tc753
I’m not sure why you thought I was making this up.
The best part is I now have a gnarly scar right under him that looks like a path of burnination. Unrelated, burnination is a real word.
Yes, but you have to have had none the previous year to claim the tax exempt status that lets you avoid any withholding.
Again, a “best of” list of 20 some odd movies spanning many years based on the author’s opinion doesn’t support the doubt they were expressing because it doesn’t provide enough information.
You need to learn what an argument is.
Saying you doubt a claim and providing evidence for your doubts is an argument against the validity of the claim.
My saying that the evidence you provided doesn’t support your doubt is a valid criticism and doesn’t mean I support the claim you’re doubting.
I answered that in the comment you quoted.
You need to learn that criticizing the validity someone’s argument isn’t support for the other side.
And my point was that their links didn’t support their doubt.
Pointing out someone’s argument is flawed doesn’t mean you support the other side of the argument.
You can only do that if you had no tax liability the previous year. If you try, your employer will likely kick it back for you to fix, or the IRS will send them a letter telling them to fix it.
Please provide a quote of me making a statement regarding the validity of either side of the claim.
I did no such thing. That’s you extrapolating incorrectly.
Literally all I said was that the provided information isn’t relevant to the discussion.
There’s 30 of them, though.
I’d rather die in my sleep than slowly starving to death in the wilderness.
The military needs to step in and follow their oath to protect against threats to the country/constitution.
This reminds me that I need to bug my wife to touch up my Trogdor tattoo (she was a professional artist before the economy went tits up)
It doesn’t take anywhere close to 90%. Disney lost 1.3% of their subscribers before reversing their decision on Kimmel.
The key is getting media attention that survives one 24h cycle.
Yes, I’m saying the data provided has no relevance to the discussion one way or the other.
That’s because thus far no one has provided any data that’s relevant to either side of the argument.
Aggregated lists of the “best” blockbusters with women leads are irrelevant to the discussion.
Traps harming people indiscriminately is an extremely valid reason to ban them.
But a high number of blockbusters with female leads still doesn’t contradict the claim.
The claim wasn’t that there aren’t any blockbusters with female leads, it was that there are more with men who are also sexual predators.
And those links don’t even show that there’s a high number of blockbusters with female leads. They’re just an aggregated list of the best profitable movies with female leads. You need to have the grand total of blockbusters, and the total number of blockbusters with female leads to draw that conclusion.
Because the IRS says so? Did you not read the quoted passage?