Stop whining.

Prove what? That you can’t cite a law?

You’re saying absolute goddamned nonsense.

If he’s always on top of things, why is he doing this now and not sooner?

No, wrong. Or else teachers would be able to make copies of textbooks, and they’re not.

Yeah, this is definitely wrong. Giving away something you don’t own is still illegal.

That’s beyond bad taste and into active stupidity.

There are whole-ass companies selling laptops with Linux preinstalled now. They work. Even with Bluetooth.

However, if you link this to an uptick in antisemitism tied to lies about Israel spread by “decolonizers” you’re Noticing Things, And Therefore Wrong.

Huh. In the UK, they just put them on waiting lists until they die.

https://www.bbc.com/news/health-67087906

Even the descendants of slaves are living in a country slavery helped build.

Nothing they do will ever mean anything, because nothing can redeem the past.

Had the script called for him to shoot himself, he would have checked the firearm.

More to the point: Why didn’t Alec Baldwin check the firearm?

If the script called for him to shoot himself, you know he would have.

Because they’re hateful shitheads.

A funeral home contains dead bodies? THE HORROR!

“It isn’t my fault I was a monster! It was that nasty Alex Jones! Honest! YA GOTTA BELIEVE ME!”

Yeah, pull the other one.

And HTTPS does that. It’s encrypted.

You can only go as high on that scale as your opponent did. For example, you can’t refute the central point of an insult or an attempt at shaming without missing the point that it is simply meant to make you angry or meant to make others completely disregard you. Similarly, if the “argument” is incoherent babbling, you don’t refute it so much as point out that it’s nonsensical.

Here’s a good article about debate and meta-debate.

Every piece of information you give someone can be linked to every other piece of information.

Username + Votes is not a hard connection to make.