Linux has that issue too. A process in an uninterruptible blocking syscall stays until that syscall finishes, which can be never if something weird’s going on.
she/they
Linux has that issue too. A process in an uninterruptible blocking syscall stays until that syscall finishes, which can be never if something weird’s going on.
KDE can murder windows instantly (you have to set a shortcut), or you can also just send SIGKILL to the process
Let’s say a goal is a description of properties of a world state you would like to achieve. A goal can then encompass many possible world states, where unconstrained variables can be anything.
So if you want A, that does not necessarily have bearing on B. So people might say that the ends (reaching A) don’t justify the means (causing B). However, I’d say they underspecified their goal. Usually, people’s goals are goal + all of ethics.
Well they’re no friends of mine. At least we can go where we want to and leave your friends behind.
As long as they’re lenient on syntax and spelling mistakes the writing isn’t so bad, the worst part is not being able to test it at all.
Not having a conscience, probably
It’s not sufficient, but it is necessary. They also have to invest (AKA owning the means of production, wonder why that’s so profitable…)
I don’t keep up with ad campaigns, what?
I bet they have a copy of every native library they use except like libc, and probably don’t do any dead code elimination on those. And maybe they also have copies of the app for different ARM versions. And then an additional 20MB of JavaScript because everyone does these days.
It feels uncomfortable constantly hearing people justify your value based on your relation to men. I know it doesn’t specify men, but let’s be honest, that’s what everyone thinks of. If you have good intentions, that’s good, but that doesn’t stop the implication that women are only valuable as they relate to men. Intentions do not factor into someone’s frustration hearing it for the millionth damn time! Until that phrase gets reclaimed, it’s gonna have that patriarchal association to most people.
I’ll just send a hurricane to his house.
I did, and this bitch (who’s in a position of power over me) took my joking remark as an opportunity to say climate change is a hoax. He lives in Florida.
How convoluted was it?
I was gonna joke that they must not have friends then, but that’s actually a pretty common problem.
I’d rather hear “you’re weird”, even that’s better than the immediate jump to “you’re a bad person” that’s more common.
I wish people were more willing to say “I don’t understand”.
I yearn for a day user agents can not suck. Backups and syncing should not be this hard!
const is more like C++ constexpr, but static is similar to static from C: it’s a variable that lives outside any scope. Of course, that means the same static can be accessed by multiple threads, so writing to a static is unsafe (except for types like Mutex, you can safely use those to write, but your static won’t be declared mut)
Well, so do humans