• Varyk@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      No it isn’t.

      Presenting independently verifiable facts in a way that bolsters your perspective is not the same as making up stories and using entirely false data to incite your listeners.

        • Varyk@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          Not the ones I’ve spoken to.

          Conservatives won’t usually meet a challenging topic head on, they try to avoid and misdirect from rather than address an issue.

          It boils down to a fundamental difference in perspective and ultimately behavior.

          When conservatives are presented with information, even completely made up stories, that agree with their preconceived notions, they accept the story regardless of the logic or substance of the story. Once information that disagrees with their preconceived notions arises, they reject the story regardless of the logic or substance because it isn’t something they’ve learned before.

          When liberals are presented with information, they accept or reject the story based on the available substantiated information and how it fits into what they have learned so far.

          This is the process behind what fundamentally makes a “conservative” and a “liberal”.

          Conservatives are inherently afraid of challenges to their worldview and as a result, resist change simply for the sake of protecting themselves as long as possible.

          Liberals are also inherently afraid of challenges to their worldview, but persist in discovering the truth and apply what they’ve learned to their behavior because of the benefits that context, understanding and new knowledge might bring about.