• thanks_shakey_snake@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    7 months ago
     Behavior |  Reasonableneses |
    

    |----------|-----------------------------------| | Substituting applesauce | 8/10 | | One-starring the recipe because it didn’t work out | 0/10 |

    • SeekPie@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      7 months ago

      Lemmy supports tables? Damn, never seen one here in the comments. Good to know!

        • grue@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          Tables are supported on the web page (Lemmy.world using the default UI); they just didn’t do it right (for the default UI).

          Example:

          Behavior Reasonableness
          Substituting applesauce 8/10
          One-starring the recipe because it didn’t work out 0/10

          Markup used to construct it:

          Behavior | Reasonableness
          ---- | ----
          Substituting applesauce | 8/10
          One-starring the recipe because it didn't work out | 0/10
          

          Note that it’s entirely possible that different Lemmy clients have different, mutually incompatible, Markdown implementations. I’ve already noticed one such difference: in the Lemmy.world default web UI, ~x~ does a subscript, but in my Voyager Android app, it does a strikethru.

          • aeharding@vger.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            7 months ago

            but in my Voyager Android app, it does a strikethru

            You must be using a really old version of voyager. This was fixed a while back

            • grue@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              7 months ago

              Could be. I’m using the F-Droid version, which tends to lag behind the Play Store version because of all the extra vetting they do.

              • aeharding@vger.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                7 months ago

                Can you check the version in “Settings -> About”? Some users have reported issues with F-droid auto update. F-droid should be up to 2.9.1.

                • grue@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  7 months ago

                  F-Droid had notified me to update Voyager to 2.9.1, but I hadn’t bothered to do it yet.

        • lad@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 months ago

          Thunder renders a table, but it uses a library for most of markdown (except lemmy-specific like spoilers)

    • lad@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      Except “one-starring the original recipe because the modified recipe didn’t work out”

      Because otherwise it looks very reasonable instead of very not reasonable

      • Ech@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        "It” refers to the substitution, not the recipe.

        • lad@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 months ago

          I see your point now. For me it doesn’t really read like it, because you have it in another cell of the table which gives it too little weight as a possible context for dereferencing the pronoun, while also having a valid noun preceding the pronoun begging to become referenced by it.

          Yeah, I must be fun at parties, I know 😅

      • thanks_shakey_snake@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        I see your point. If you view the cells as separate contexts, then it would be necessary to specify that “the substitution” is the thing that didn’t work out.