• njm1314@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    2 months ago

    I think it’d be easier to take yes for an answer if she said the word yes. And frankly I question why someone can’t use the word yes if it’s such a clear yes

      • Cadeillac@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        33
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        2 months ago

        In so many words, yes she did. Wait, why does a clear yes have so many words?

        • cogman@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          2 months ago

          Well, if we prove her quotes accurate we can surmise that she may have said yes, with further investigation. But I’ll tell you, once we get to the bottom of our deep investigation we will find that she may possibly believe putin might be a war criminal given the current political climate of the UN and the ongoing hostilities in nations. After all, we need to address the issue of tariffs in china.

      • TheFonz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        23
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        How come she can give a clear yes for Biden but Putis it has to be surrounded by a million qualifiers? Multiple times.

        We all watched the interview. What are you trying to prove.

        • jumjummy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          Eh, the OP asking the question is operating in bad faith. They are most likely some disinformation shill or useful idiot who just espouses 3rd party or bust vibes every time I see them. You’re going to have as much luck getting through to them as Hasan had of getting Stein to say “yes.” with no qualifiers attached.