Wow this post got popular. I got called into work and didnt see the replies, sorry ladies and gentlemen! Trying to catch up tonight.

    • big_onion@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      62
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      About 15 years ago I volunteered with a pitbull rescue, then did a bunch of research on pitbull attacks in grad school. The problem then was that most statistics like this were unreliable once you saw what they labeled a pitbull. In most cases it was just any “mutt” was considered a pitbull. I don’t know if things have changed, never really looked into it since then, but I’m still a bit wary of stats like this without knowing their data is accurate.

      • Beelzebubba@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        26
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        My little dog doesn’t have an ounce of pitbull in her. Her mom was a border collie/lab mix, and the Father was the Neighbor’s boston terrier/english pointer mix. The only thing remotely pitbull like about her is her underbite. That said, I’ve lost count of the times somebody at the dog park, usually someone with a little ankle biter dog of the teacup persuasion, has gotten uppity about me having a “pitbull” off leash. People are dumb.

      • jasondj@ttrpg.network
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        It doesn’t help that a lot of strays/rescues have a good chunk of pit bull blood in them.

        Both of my dogs are rescues from programs in the southern US. One of them certainly seems to have some pit in him…beautiful brindle coat, block head, incredibly strong jaw, stocky-muscular build. He’s dumb as a bag of rocks but incredibly loyal and affectionate. Because of the stigma around pits, though, I’m afraid to get him DNA tested.

      • Ataraxia@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Actually it’s more likely a pitt is labeled incorrectly like a lab etc to get them adopted to people too ignorant to know better. So that’s gonna invalidate that statement.

      • bobman@unilem.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        In most cases it was just any “mutt” was considered a pitbull.

        Seems like an issue specific to wherever you went to school.

        Most rational people would immediately draw clear separations between mutts and pitbulls or pitbull mixes.

        I don’t think this comment is indicative of the problem at all.

        Curious where you went to school though, lol. Might want to get a refund for that degree.

    • SheeEttin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      And it’s probably worse if you do rate by breed.

      But I suspect that it’s mostly due to a combination of breed and neglect/non-training. The kind of people who want a pit bull in particular, and the kind of people who just chain up their dog outside and never train or socialize it, probably have significant overlap.

    • joel_feila@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah that study probably relied on faulty data. Most dog bite data just the person what the breed was.

      Did tou know putbull is not 1 breed but 3 different ones.

      Most people cant reliably tell an american pitbul from other breeds in a line up.

      • Crashumbc@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Actually, “pitbulls” are now well over a dozen different breeds people just randomly consider “pitbulls”

        If it’s a stocky mutt with short hair . It’s a pitbull!