Wouldn’t leasing or renting be more accurate depending on what’s involved and the circumstances?

  • phubarr@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    16 天前

    What are you talking about? “Taxes don’t have anything to do with ownership”

    Your county sends the person on the deed to the house a tax bill every year. For me, it works out to over $300 per month for a very modest house. If you have a mortgage, it’s bundled into the mortgage payments.

      • phubarr@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        15 天前

        Functionally, there’s no difference. The amount they demand is based off your house’s value, and they take it away from you if you don’t pay. The label is just a detail. And it’s not a trivial cost, I inherited a small, aged, worn out house and I pay over $300/mo just to exist in it. The tax office wildly overestimated it’s value and there’s nothing I can do about it.

        • silly goose meekah@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          15 天前

          When you’re renting, you’re always also paying this tax indirectly. Functionally it’s a tax for having a roof over your head, whether you own it or not*. So it has nothing to do with ownership.

          I guess you can argue somewhere in the direction of “tax is theft”, but that’s a different discussion.

          *kinda opposing my previous statement, I guess it would be more accurate to say that paying the tax directly to the government is kind of a proof of ownership.