Disturbing visuals of Hamas parading a naked and battered body of a woman on the streets of Israel have emerged. Another woman confirmed that it was her sister, a German citizen, seen in the video.

As the Israel-Gaza conflict rages, disturbing visuals of fighters of the Palestinian armed group Hamas parading a naked and battered body of a woman through the streets of Israel in the back of a pickup truck have emerged.

According to videos that surfaced on social media, a screaming crowd surrounds the Hamas’ vehicle, echoing their cries and spitting on the woman’s body.

Hamas initially claimed that the body belonged to a female Israeli soldier, according to news.com.au. However, Adi Louk confirmed on X that the woman seen in the video was her sister, Shani Louk, a German citizen and a tattoo artist, reported the New York Post.

Shani Louk’s mother, in a video message posted by Visegrad 24 on X, confirmed her daughter’s identity and appealed to people for more information regarding her whereabouts.

        • SuperCuber@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          32
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          More like, “have you tried attacking only military targets and not massacring civilians”?

          • Risk@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            16
            arrow-down
            8
            ·
            1 year ago

            I’m not defending Hamas/Hezbollah/terrorism but the Israeli State - and anybody paying attention - doesn’t get to act all surprised at this result when you repress a population.

            The status quo of Israel, Gaza, and Palestine is a deliberate product of those in control of the situation - and the populations are the ones that suffer the consequences.

      • Cethin@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        I love that the answer to alternatives is “not that.” So you suggest they continue to do nothing and let the IDF kill innocent people? This isn’t “good” but neither is the status quo.

        • osarusan@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I love the dishonest replies that pretend “not that” means “nothing at all.”

          • Cethin@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            The point is they’re actually there, have been living in the situation, and are doing something. You’re only response is that that isn’t allowed. You aren’t there or in their situation. You should keep your mouth shut if the most helpful thing you have to add is “not that.” It was brutal and horrible before this and it’ll be brutal and horrible after.

            • osarusan@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              You aren’t there or in their situation. You should keep your mouth shut

              You realize that applies to you equally, right? I hope you do. Because this is the dishonesty I’m talking about.

              In actually, I have as much right as you to comment on this situation, especially since this is an internet forum where the whole point is discussion. So “keep your mouth shut” is just about the most useless comment ever, and should be heeded by those who think to say it.

              So, yes. I am well within my rights to say that murdering hundreds of civilians at a music festival, and raping, beating, and parading naked a foreign national are not the right way to go about protesting oppression by the Israeli government. Just as you are well within your rights to argue that those are acceptable things to do. It’s an awful thing for you to defend, but you’re allowed to express that opinion.

              • Cethin@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Absolutely it applies equally to me. Where did I say they should or shouldn’t be doing anything?

                You have the right to say whatever you want. War is nasty, and a weaker forcer fighting a stronger force is usually even worse. They can’t win a head on attack. The only reasonable option is guerilla attacks on targets of opportunity. I’m not going to say what those targets are allowed to be or what tools or methods they’re allowed to employ.

                The people of Israel have elected far-right leaders with Zionist ideals. Not all of them obviously, but all of them did have a choice. If they finally faced consequences for Zionism they might change their mind. I doubt that’ll happen with this (it’ll probably make it worse) but if things fall together in the right way it could. I don’t know what other options they have other than keep getting murdered and having their houses stolen.

                • osarusan@kbin.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  I’m not going to say what those targets are allowed to be or what tools or methods they’re allowed to employ.

                  And I think that’s a shame.

                  Slaughtering, raping, and torturing civilians and foreign nationals who are in no way involved in the decision making process is not acceptable. Hard stop.

                  It’s shameful that you won’t say that too.

    • JasSmith@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      34
      arrow-down
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      There are many choices besides “nothing” and “murder innocent people.” Even if those were the only choices, nothing is better. Hurting innocent people doesn’t improve the lives of Palestinians. It makes them worse. It also hurts innocent people.

      • SARGEx117@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        23
        arrow-down
        14
        ·
        1 year ago

        So give them a solution they’ve never thought of before. I’m sure your internet degree is sufficient to convince them.

        Everyone likes to preach about how it’s wrong to do the thing they’re doing, but nobody EVER has an alternative that will actually work, or hasn’t been tried before.

        I don’t have a solution, and THIS certainly isn’t it, but then I’m not dragging a soapbox around with me.

        Go give the IRA a better solution. Go give the American colonists a better solution against the redcoats. Give the poor of france a better solution during the French revolution.

        I don’t have a better way, but don’t pretend like you do

        • Hyperreality@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          A better way was offered at Camp David in 2000. Arafat walked away from the table without making a concrete counter-offer. Israeli PM Barak offered deeply unpopular and unprecedented concessions. Saudi prince Bandar described not accepting the deal or negotiating further as criminal. Arafat won popularity when he walked away.

          That is just one incident in a long and complicated history, but the point is that there’s more than enough blame to go around and there were other options.

          Time and again, both parties chose to continue further down this road. They’ll likely continue to do so for the foreseeable future. I say likely, because that isn’t even the worst case scenario. Israel’s government is arguably borderline far right now, so it’s not impossible that this will all escalate so much that there one way or another, it’s ‘resolved’ through outright violence.

        • JasSmith@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          So give them a solution they’ve never thought of before. I’m sure your internet degree is sufficient to convince them… I don’t have a better way, but don’t pretend like you do.

          I am not claiming I have a solution. Far from it. I am in no position of authority or influence. In fact, it’s not my responsibility to fix the conflict. I am merely condemning the assault, rape, and murder of innocent people. I do not believe there is any justification for this.

      • Phanatik@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        In their eyes, Israel has been hurting innocent people since this began. They received no international condemnation for it. The innocent people in Palestine went largely ignored by the international community.

        • JasSmith@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          I don’t understand how that is a response or argument. I agree with your description of events. I’m disagreeing with the response. Yes, they’ve been treated unfairly. No, beating, raping, and murdering innocent people is not an acceptable response.

        • osarusan@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yes. All of that is correct. And still there are many choices besides “nothing” and “murder innocent people.”